After a few weeks of some very heavy hitters coming into your living room, this week it's far more tempered. We have a big budget flop, and a huge hit from the holiday season. But, that's the great thing about having these come into your home quickly these days.
For an economical price, you can see a movie you may have been curious about, and see it for not a huge price. Both of these major releases fit that criteria. Remember, we only feature major motion picture releases here, and not TV series or straight to video movies. I also link you back to my original review where applicable, so you can make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit buy on your pay-per-view.
What's New This Week
Anchorman 2
Will Farrell and the entire troupe is back for the sequel to the huge hit original comedy. Funny and clever at times, but this is pretty much two different movies. Really out there.
47 Ronin
Keanu Reeves' big budget action martial arts flick that generated very little interest during the busy holiday rush. Lots of action, and really different for him in general.
scott@wqmx.com
Monday, March 31, 2014
Sunday, March 30, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - God's Not Dead
This new agenda-laden movie is going to be a great example of a movie that Hollywood critics are going to loathe, and those who choose to go to see it are going to love.
God's Not Dead has an agenda. It is a Christian based story that in many instances preaches, and makes no secret that it has something to say. And it does. But in all things fair in cinema, so do lots of other movies that Hollywood creates. Only this one has an agenda that is far outside of the basic Hollywood framework. I think to review this fairly, you have to pretend it's a movie that is promoting certain politics, or an environmental message for examples. This in that regard is no different. I think that's simply the fair thing to do. We certainly have movies that are on the other side of the agenda fence fence.
This is the story of a number of non-connected people living in the same college town. They all are having a crisis of some kind, or are involved with those who have real problems. Some of which we can see, some we cannot. And it all revolves around a young college freshman named Josh (Shane Harper). He is in an early philosophy class with a bully of a professor (Kevin Sorbo), who is making the class all sign a pledge that God is dead before they can move on with the class. The Prof is an admitted atheist and does not want to be bothered with talk of the supernatural for the semester while discussing his discipline. Josh is a Christian and will not sign. The Prof then assigns Josh the task of trying to convince the class of his argument with the idea of total failure, and embarrassment in front of the entire class.
He even bullies Josh into threatening to fail him. He is an awful person on the surface and you sense he's got something big to hide. Josh accepts the challenge, and proceeds encountering many roadblocks along the way. You can guess where this goes, and how it gets there. And there are no real surprises. The other stories revolve around this main one, and each is an instance where someone in need, moves one step closer to believing.
Yes, this has problems not doubt. It is preachy at times, and predictable most of the time. This is also a limited appeal and release flick that will get trashed all along the way. Some of it warranted. Some will judge as they walk in.
But the origins of this movie are fairly interesting. It was inspired from, and based on, but not a true story from a few dozen actual lawsuits and cases filed over the years on documented cases coast to coast. All from students being bullied by the faculty of numerous colleges and universities. Cases where students were threatened or pushed to compromise their spiritual beliefs from professors for grades or acceptance. And they are all listed at the movies end.
What this really is, is simple. It is spotlighting, and totally indicting the secondary education system educators long thought by many to have their own way of doing things in the classroom. Faculty in this story are portrayed as elitist, condescending, awful people. In a perfect world for the movie makers, they would hope that young adults would see this and feel empowered going off to college. And parents who go, could get a look at what their kids could possibly be facing, especially early on in their college experience.
As a movie, it is fair at best. A good and capable cast, written moderately well, and eye opening to a degree. But this is not subtle. It has a statement to make, and makes it. I respect that. But it stumbles badly towards the end and sells us a bit too hard, and is just a bit too obvious when it was already walking a thin line. But the inspiration for this I found interesting, even if the sum of all its parts are flawed.
God's Not Dead. Those who go will more than likely love this. But many will wave this off.
God's Not Dead has an agenda. It is a Christian based story that in many instances preaches, and makes no secret that it has something to say. And it does. But in all things fair in cinema, so do lots of other movies that Hollywood creates. Only this one has an agenda that is far outside of the basic Hollywood framework. I think to review this fairly, you have to pretend it's a movie that is promoting certain politics, or an environmental message for examples. This in that regard is no different. I think that's simply the fair thing to do. We certainly have movies that are on the other side of the agenda fence fence.
This is the story of a number of non-connected people living in the same college town. They all are having a crisis of some kind, or are involved with those who have real problems. Some of which we can see, some we cannot. And it all revolves around a young college freshman named Josh (Shane Harper). He is in an early philosophy class with a bully of a professor (Kevin Sorbo), who is making the class all sign a pledge that God is dead before they can move on with the class. The Prof is an admitted atheist and does not want to be bothered with talk of the supernatural for the semester while discussing his discipline. Josh is a Christian and will not sign. The Prof then assigns Josh the task of trying to convince the class of his argument with the idea of total failure, and embarrassment in front of the entire class.
He even bullies Josh into threatening to fail him. He is an awful person on the surface and you sense he's got something big to hide. Josh accepts the challenge, and proceeds encountering many roadblocks along the way. You can guess where this goes, and how it gets there. And there are no real surprises. The other stories revolve around this main one, and each is an instance where someone in need, moves one step closer to believing.
Yes, this has problems not doubt. It is preachy at times, and predictable most of the time. This is also a limited appeal and release flick that will get trashed all along the way. Some of it warranted. Some will judge as they walk in.
But the origins of this movie are fairly interesting. It was inspired from, and based on, but not a true story from a few dozen actual lawsuits and cases filed over the years on documented cases coast to coast. All from students being bullied by the faculty of numerous colleges and universities. Cases where students were threatened or pushed to compromise their spiritual beliefs from professors for grades or acceptance. And they are all listed at the movies end.
What this really is, is simple. It is spotlighting, and totally indicting the secondary education system educators long thought by many to have their own way of doing things in the classroom. Faculty in this story are portrayed as elitist, condescending, awful people. In a perfect world for the movie makers, they would hope that young adults would see this and feel empowered going off to college. And parents who go, could get a look at what their kids could possibly be facing, especially early on in their college experience.
As a movie, it is fair at best. A good and capable cast, written moderately well, and eye opening to a degree. But this is not subtle. It has a statement to make, and makes it. I respect that. But it stumbles badly towards the end and sells us a bit too hard, and is just a bit too obvious when it was already walking a thin line. But the inspiration for this I found interesting, even if the sum of all its parts are flawed.
God's Not Dead. Those who go will more than likely love this. But many will wave this off.
MOVIE REVIEW -The Grand Budapest Hotel
Little independent movies can be a real trip when you go, and that certainly can be said of the new off-beat comedy, The Grand Budapest Hotel.
To say that this has a limited audience is being kind. This film is exceedingly strange, and deliciously quirky, Too much for many, but if you like that kind of stuff this is perfect for you. This has a great cast, all in small roles, and that's part of the fun.
This is the story told in flashback form of a man who is recalling his story to a young writer in 1968. The man, Zero, is telling the story of how he came to own this old grand European Hotel that goes back to the 1930's. To say this is far too complicated to explain here is the movie review understatement of the year. It takes us back to when Zero was a simple "Lobby Boy" at the hotel, with the mentoring of an eccentric concierge named M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes). They go on this huge journey together and somehow Zero, ends up owning the hotel.
This is amazingly unique and wonderfully fun, with countless laugh out loud moments. It is shameless at times, silly at times, smart and really funny. There are a boatload of Hollywood stars in this, and watching them pop up throughout the entire movie is half the fun. This will only be around for a short time, so you better go quickly. Theaters are limited, and this will not go to wide release. It is being reviewed well nationally, and here as well. Fun adult stuff.
The Grand Budapest Hotel. You have to love independent movies to like this. Pretty darn funny, and wildly off beat.
To say that this has a limited audience is being kind. This film is exceedingly strange, and deliciously quirky, Too much for many, but if you like that kind of stuff this is perfect for you. This has a great cast, all in small roles, and that's part of the fun.
This is the story told in flashback form of a man who is recalling his story to a young writer in 1968. The man, Zero, is telling the story of how he came to own this old grand European Hotel that goes back to the 1930's. To say this is far too complicated to explain here is the movie review understatement of the year. It takes us back to when Zero was a simple "Lobby Boy" at the hotel, with the mentoring of an eccentric concierge named M. Gustave (Ralph Fiennes). They go on this huge journey together and somehow Zero, ends up owning the hotel.
This is amazingly unique and wonderfully fun, with countless laugh out loud moments. It is shameless at times, silly at times, smart and really funny. There are a boatload of Hollywood stars in this, and watching them pop up throughout the entire movie is half the fun. This will only be around for a short time, so you better go quickly. Theaters are limited, and this will not go to wide release. It is being reviewed well nationally, and here as well. Fun adult stuff.
The Grand Budapest Hotel. You have to love independent movies to like this. Pretty darn funny, and wildly off beat.
Saturday, March 29, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - Sabotage
Arnold Schwarzenegger is back in yet another action movie, Sabotage.
You might think that it may be time to hang it up on some of these kind of movies, and select his roles, perhaps a big more carefully. He is in his upper 60's now, and it's becoming more difficult all the time to believe he is an action hero of this magnitude. But, here he is.
Truth is, HE is really not the big problem in this movie. The trouble is, this is an ugly, ugly movie. The writers and directors go to great lengths to show us every single imaginable blown off body part, pools of blood, and exceedingly gruesome death scenes. Over and over again.
This is the story of an elite DEA enforcement troupe led by John (Arnold). They go covert, and find themselves in the worst drug havens one can imagine. But after one raid goes wrong, they lose a team member, and someone rips off the drug cartel of about 10 million dollars. The money of course is considered missing by the DEA, and John is suspended, and the group is put on hold.
But after the investigation is over, they are cleared and they go back to work. Trouble is, the group starts getting picked off one-by-one in grizzly form, by someone we don't know. Since the murders happen in Atlanta, the APD gets involved and they begin their own investigation. Who is doing this? Is it one of their own trying to get the 10 million? And why? Or is it the cartel wanting their 10 mill back?
If you like a to see horrible, grizzly death, this is your movie. This is amazingly bloody, with a high emphasis on the gross-me-out factor. Being fair this is horror movie violent, and I guess it needs to be in the directors mind, because that's about all its got. Thin on plot (which is easy to figure out in the first 15 minutes), and short on any real attempt at serious movie making. This will though, have the "I like Arnold" factor, and I admit I do. When he gets the right role, he can be fun on screen, even in these movies.
Most of these Arnold movies do have an underlying charm that make them palatable, but not here. This is ugly, dark, dank, and charmless. But, I think they felt no choice, since they are dealing with the cartel, who are truly horrible people in the mix. But this will have limited appeal, and will come and go quickly.
Sabotage. Tough stuff , not really a date night flick.
You might think that it may be time to hang it up on some of these kind of movies, and select his roles, perhaps a big more carefully. He is in his upper 60's now, and it's becoming more difficult all the time to believe he is an action hero of this magnitude. But, here he is.
Truth is, HE is really not the big problem in this movie. The trouble is, this is an ugly, ugly movie. The writers and directors go to great lengths to show us every single imaginable blown off body part, pools of blood, and exceedingly gruesome death scenes. Over and over again.
This is the story of an elite DEA enforcement troupe led by John (Arnold). They go covert, and find themselves in the worst drug havens one can imagine. But after one raid goes wrong, they lose a team member, and someone rips off the drug cartel of about 10 million dollars. The money of course is considered missing by the DEA, and John is suspended, and the group is put on hold.
But after the investigation is over, they are cleared and they go back to work. Trouble is, the group starts getting picked off one-by-one in grizzly form, by someone we don't know. Since the murders happen in Atlanta, the APD gets involved and they begin their own investigation. Who is doing this? Is it one of their own trying to get the 10 million? And why? Or is it the cartel wanting their 10 mill back?
If you like a to see horrible, grizzly death, this is your movie. This is amazingly bloody, with a high emphasis on the gross-me-out factor. Being fair this is horror movie violent, and I guess it needs to be in the directors mind, because that's about all its got. Thin on plot (which is easy to figure out in the first 15 minutes), and short on any real attempt at serious movie making. This will though, have the "I like Arnold" factor, and I admit I do. When he gets the right role, he can be fun on screen, even in these movies.
Most of these Arnold movies do have an underlying charm that make them palatable, but not here. This is ugly, dark, dank, and charmless. But, I think they felt no choice, since they are dealing with the cartel, who are truly horrible people in the mix. But this will have limited appeal, and will come and go quickly.
Sabotage. Tough stuff , not really a date night flick.
Friday, March 28, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - Noah
Here comes the seasons first big blockbuster, Russell Crowe stars in the big budget film, Noah.
Let me be the first to tell you this is big in about every single way. And for may reasons, this is not for everybody. This is deep, and heavy, and pretty tough to take at times for very young or casual viewers. And for some, this will look nothing like the story they've read in the Bible. There is plenty of creative license, and that's fine. It is their interpretation of this story.
Crowe stars as Noah, and leads an all-star cast including Emma Watson, Jennifer Connolly, Anthony Hopkins and more. This movie has also generated more than just buzz, it has created a fervor for some by the replacing of the word God with Creator for the entire movie. Also, for not following the story literally from the Biblical one. The basics are in place. Noah is charged with the starting over of the world after the great flood, and is also charged with building the Ark to do so.
That's about where I can stop telling you the story, because you'll want to see where they go. But we can instead focus on the movie making. This is pretty intense carrying a PG-13 rating. Clearly, there is no foul language, and of course nothing really objectionable in its form. But some of this is very tough to take. There is brief, but quite disturbing animal torture, and there is a significant amount of violence that is lengthy, albeit mostly computer generated. So just be aware.
But there is good here. The sets when they are real or computer, are sensational. The costuming is great, makeup too. They successfully transport us back to biblical times and this looks very authentic. There is a big musical soundtrack that accompanies this, that adds to the mystique, and to the drama. And that's exactly what this is. A drama. Two hours and twenty minutes of deep drama. Crow is terrific as Noah, who is depicted here as a highly devoted and deeply conflicted man, who comes to understand the gravity of the charge the "Creator" has given him. Sadly, as good as much of this is, there are segments that look out of place, and video-gamey at times, and they stuck out like a sore thumb.
Overall, there is a lot to like here for many But for some this will leave them flat. And keep in mind, true or historical events are seldom told 100 percent accurately in cinema. And that holds true with this. But since it is a biblical story, there seems to be less wiggle room for movie makers. This is not a defense of the these makers, it is just how it's done. My suggestion would be watch the movie if you choose to, on it's script, and if it differs from your own interpretation of events, just know that is nothing new. People have been debating many biblical stories for centuries around the dinner table so it should be no surprise we can do it with the movies.
Noah. Harsh at times, very good at times, and big all the time. Big budget movie season is underway.
Let me be the first to tell you this is big in about every single way. And for may reasons, this is not for everybody. This is deep, and heavy, and pretty tough to take at times for very young or casual viewers. And for some, this will look nothing like the story they've read in the Bible. There is plenty of creative license, and that's fine. It is their interpretation of this story.
Crowe stars as Noah, and leads an all-star cast including Emma Watson, Jennifer Connolly, Anthony Hopkins and more. This movie has also generated more than just buzz, it has created a fervor for some by the replacing of the word God with Creator for the entire movie. Also, for not following the story literally from the Biblical one. The basics are in place. Noah is charged with the starting over of the world after the great flood, and is also charged with building the Ark to do so.
That's about where I can stop telling you the story, because you'll want to see where they go. But we can instead focus on the movie making. This is pretty intense carrying a PG-13 rating. Clearly, there is no foul language, and of course nothing really objectionable in its form. But some of this is very tough to take. There is brief, but quite disturbing animal torture, and there is a significant amount of violence that is lengthy, albeit mostly computer generated. So just be aware.
But there is good here. The sets when they are real or computer, are sensational. The costuming is great, makeup too. They successfully transport us back to biblical times and this looks very authentic. There is a big musical soundtrack that accompanies this, that adds to the mystique, and to the drama. And that's exactly what this is. A drama. Two hours and twenty minutes of deep drama. Crow is terrific as Noah, who is depicted here as a highly devoted and deeply conflicted man, who comes to understand the gravity of the charge the "Creator" has given him. Sadly, as good as much of this is, there are segments that look out of place, and video-gamey at times, and they stuck out like a sore thumb.
Overall, there is a lot to like here for many But for some this will leave them flat. And keep in mind, true or historical events are seldom told 100 percent accurately in cinema. And that holds true with this. But since it is a biblical story, there seems to be less wiggle room for movie makers. This is not a defense of the these makers, it is just how it's done. My suggestion would be watch the movie if you choose to, on it's script, and if it differs from your own interpretation of events, just know that is nothing new. People have been debating many biblical stories for centuries around the dinner table so it should be no surprise we can do it with the movies.
Noah. Harsh at times, very good at times, and big all the time. Big budget movie season is underway.
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - Divergent
New this week is the big-budget, young adult action flick, Divergent. Thought to bring in 90 plus million in its first weekend. It did not.
This is based on the big series of books that swept through young readers recently. The hope is that this two hour-twenty minute movie would give it life. Well it's here, and even though the most die hard fans, and those just dying to love this movie will concede that this is a poor man's Hunger Games, and they were here first.
The formula is exactly the same. We go way into the future, and the world has been through a huge war, and there is a simple bare-bones society left. We have a young woman hero and main star, who is the change that the new world society seems to need to save and enhance itself. She is a brave soldier of change, and she is considered dangerous to the establishment. All the while, falling in love with a young hunk with similar pedigree and situation. In its formula, it's The Hunger Games.
There are some differences though. In Divergent, we are in what's left of Chicago about 100 years in the future. The war has destroyed the world, and there is a big fence around Chicago to keep out the unknowns. Society is broken down into 5 factions, and when teens reach a certain age, they have to decide what faction they want to live in, many times leaving their families. Each faction has a certain skill set that makes the new world work. But once you leave, you can never go back to your original faction.
Then there are the "Divergents." They are for some reason a threat to society because they have traits of all factions. They are hunted down, and eliminated by the ruling faction. Meet Tris (Shailene Woodley). She is one, and she is our star. So after she joins the soldiering faction of society, it is found that she is divergent, and so is her new love interest Four (Theo James). And after the soldiering faction is sent out to take over all factions and be the new ruling faction, these two are resistant, and give all hope.
There is a ton about this that young adults are going to bite into hard. Growing up, leaving home, going on an adventure, finding young love, playing with video game like weapons, and trying to make a big mark in the world. It's love, rebellion, and action all rolled into one. That is why the formula works. But I think that maybe movie goers might be catching on. They have seen this before, and done way better in Hunger Games.
I like Woodley, and I think that the future is bright for her. I loved her in the Descendants, and The Spectacular Now, and there are good projects in the pipe for her. But the trouble here is, that there is nothing exciting around her. This might be the most non-compelling action big budget movie in a long time. The entire time, I felt like I had seen every scene of this movie somewhere else before in various movies that were here earlier, and done better. Those who go, are going to try their best to love this, but the love for this will fall way below, Hunger Games, or even Twilight.
Divergent. Number 2 starts filming in May. But now for this release in March? Been there, done that.
This is based on the big series of books that swept through young readers recently. The hope is that this two hour-twenty minute movie would give it life. Well it's here, and even though the most die hard fans, and those just dying to love this movie will concede that this is a poor man's Hunger Games, and they were here first.
The formula is exactly the same. We go way into the future, and the world has been through a huge war, and there is a simple bare-bones society left. We have a young woman hero and main star, who is the change that the new world society seems to need to save and enhance itself. She is a brave soldier of change, and she is considered dangerous to the establishment. All the while, falling in love with a young hunk with similar pedigree and situation. In its formula, it's The Hunger Games.
There are some differences though. In Divergent, we are in what's left of Chicago about 100 years in the future. The war has destroyed the world, and there is a big fence around Chicago to keep out the unknowns. Society is broken down into 5 factions, and when teens reach a certain age, they have to decide what faction they want to live in, many times leaving their families. Each faction has a certain skill set that makes the new world work. But once you leave, you can never go back to your original faction.
Then there are the "Divergents." They are for some reason a threat to society because they have traits of all factions. They are hunted down, and eliminated by the ruling faction. Meet Tris (Shailene Woodley). She is one, and she is our star. So after she joins the soldiering faction of society, it is found that she is divergent, and so is her new love interest Four (Theo James). And after the soldiering faction is sent out to take over all factions and be the new ruling faction, these two are resistant, and give all hope.
There is a ton about this that young adults are going to bite into hard. Growing up, leaving home, going on an adventure, finding young love, playing with video game like weapons, and trying to make a big mark in the world. It's love, rebellion, and action all rolled into one. That is why the formula works. But I think that maybe movie goers might be catching on. They have seen this before, and done way better in Hunger Games.
I like Woodley, and I think that the future is bright for her. I loved her in the Descendants, and The Spectacular Now, and there are good projects in the pipe for her. But the trouble here is, that there is nothing exciting around her. This might be the most non-compelling action big budget movie in a long time. The entire time, I felt like I had seen every scene of this movie somewhere else before in various movies that were here earlier, and done better. Those who go, are going to try their best to love this, but the love for this will fall way below, Hunger Games, or even Twilight.
Divergent. Number 2 starts filming in May. But now for this release in March? Been there, done that.
Monday, March 24, 2014
DVD - What's New On Streaming and DVD
This week the big movies continue to make their way to streaming services and to your local DVD counter or store shelf. There is truly something for everyone. From the adults, to the entire family, could be a fun week of movie watching for you.
I post this every week and keep in mind, I only post the major motion pictures that are released. Not TV series, or straight to video releases. I will link you back to my original review, so in case you missed these movies during their theater run, you can make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit pay on your remote.
New This Week
Wolf Of Wall Street
A big cast, and ton of Oscar nominations. This movie was a big hit with Hollywood critics, and with those that went to see it. Very long, very, very adult.
Delivery Man
Vince Vaughn comedy that was better than my said it was. It was a different kind of Vaughn comedy, and even though there were problems, it was a bit refreshing for him.
Walking With Dinosaurs
This is a big family movie that should have been a bigger hit. This got lost in the holiday rush, and fell short of expectations. It is animated, live action with characters that talk. Good for family viewing.
Last weeks DVD releases
scott@wqmx.com
I post this every week and keep in mind, I only post the major motion pictures that are released. Not TV series, or straight to video releases. I will link you back to my original review, so in case you missed these movies during their theater run, you can make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit pay on your remote.
New This Week
Wolf Of Wall Street
A big cast, and ton of Oscar nominations. This movie was a big hit with Hollywood critics, and with those that went to see it. Very long, very, very adult.
Delivery Man
Vince Vaughn comedy that was better than my said it was. It was a different kind of Vaughn comedy, and even though there were problems, it was a bit refreshing for him.
Walking With Dinosaurs
This is a big family movie that should have been a bigger hit. This got lost in the holiday rush, and fell short of expectations. It is animated, live action with characters that talk. Good for family viewing.
Last weeks DVD releases
scott@wqmx.com
Sunday, March 23, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - The Muppets Most Wanted
They keep making Muppet movies and we keep going, and for the most part, that is a good thing.
The Muppet movies have always had a good idea, especially recently that they don't take themselves too seriously. They poke fun at themselves and that is endearing to us. They are also Hollywood cameo laden films that are geared toward the young and old alike. Like this one is.
This picks up right where the last one leaves off. The Muppets are back together and now are ready to give their fans what they want. They are approached by a new agent, Dominic Badguy (Ricky Gervais) and he convinces the Muppets to sign on with him and go on a world tour. Enter Constantine. He is a Kermit The Frog look-a-like, and he has just escaped a maximum security Russian Gulag deep in Siberia. He conspires with Dominic to take over the Muppets by kidnapping Kermit and shipping him off to the Gulag in Siberia he just escaped from. They then go on a European crime spree, with the hopes of pinning all the blame on the naive Muppets and making a getaway. Constantine takes Kermits place and no one is the wiser.
That's it in a nutshell. A Cold War type of theme that 2 years ago before events in the real world took place with Russia, this may have been a bit more funny. This movie is CLEARLY written far more for adults than kids with its historical humor. And there are some fun moments here and a few fun songs. But, this movie is a victim of the real world in the timing of its release.
Right now, it isn't as funny to joke about USA/Russia relations with the Muppets. And I am not sure it was ever a really good idea to make fun of, and show in a light manner the Russian Gulags. Long considered one of the most inhumane things ever invented to incarcerate human criminals, but we do here. Toss in the fact that I think most of us are a bit over the awe of what the Muppets can do, and it has become mundane. I really liked the last movie, as it was very light-hearted and more along the lines of what good family entertainment could be. This is written way over young children's heads, and for me, that takes a bunch of the fun out of it. I am not sure at all that 5 year-olds appreciate Cold War humor.
This is also entirely too long. This would have been far more fun 20 minutes shorter, and overall more light in script. I really enjoyed some of the musical numbers, and found them to be the movies best scenes. There is also some really funny parody of the European lifestyle, Interpole, and our relations with them. But kids, are not going to get that either.
The Muppets Most Wanted. Moments of fun, but really a misfire. Not all of it, its fault.
The Muppet movies have always had a good idea, especially recently that they don't take themselves too seriously. They poke fun at themselves and that is endearing to us. They are also Hollywood cameo laden films that are geared toward the young and old alike. Like this one is.
This picks up right where the last one leaves off. The Muppets are back together and now are ready to give their fans what they want. They are approached by a new agent, Dominic Badguy (Ricky Gervais) and he convinces the Muppets to sign on with him and go on a world tour. Enter Constantine. He is a Kermit The Frog look-a-like, and he has just escaped a maximum security Russian Gulag deep in Siberia. He conspires with Dominic to take over the Muppets by kidnapping Kermit and shipping him off to the Gulag in Siberia he just escaped from. They then go on a European crime spree, with the hopes of pinning all the blame on the naive Muppets and making a getaway. Constantine takes Kermits place and no one is the wiser.
That's it in a nutshell. A Cold War type of theme that 2 years ago before events in the real world took place with Russia, this may have been a bit more funny. This movie is CLEARLY written far more for adults than kids with its historical humor. And there are some fun moments here and a few fun songs. But, this movie is a victim of the real world in the timing of its release.
Right now, it isn't as funny to joke about USA/Russia relations with the Muppets. And I am not sure it was ever a really good idea to make fun of, and show in a light manner the Russian Gulags. Long considered one of the most inhumane things ever invented to incarcerate human criminals, but we do here. Toss in the fact that I think most of us are a bit over the awe of what the Muppets can do, and it has become mundane. I really liked the last movie, as it was very light-hearted and more along the lines of what good family entertainment could be. This is written way over young children's heads, and for me, that takes a bunch of the fun out of it. I am not sure at all that 5 year-olds appreciate Cold War humor.
This is also entirely too long. This would have been far more fun 20 minutes shorter, and overall more light in script. I really enjoyed some of the musical numbers, and found them to be the movies best scenes. There is also some really funny parody of the European lifestyle, Interpole, and our relations with them. But kids, are not going to get that either.
The Muppets Most Wanted. Moments of fun, but really a misfire. Not all of it, its fault.
MOVIE REVIEW - Need For Speed
Hey, if you want to go and watch people drive cars around for 2 hours and 10 minutes, then Need For Speed is your movie.
This is based on the very popular video game, and now it's your chance to see it here on the big screen. Why? I am really not sure. This is just flat out a waste of time in about every single regard. Oh, there is some fancy driving in this movie that is to be respected, but about everything else about this movie is simply silly.
It's the "story" of a young motor-head from Mt. Kisco, New York who owns a racing shop, and drives in illegal street racing with his friends. They drive through their hometown in these amazing vintage muscle cars made 30 years before they were born. They spend their time risking everyones life in town as the roar through town at 100 plus mph, all while a friend is in the air in a private plane looking for trouble. No helmets, no seat belts, no one gets hurt, no cops, and no consequences.
He and his group a fellow racers, then hit the big time, and get involved in developing a special Shelby Mustang. (Yeah, I know.) So, then after we watch a few more silly races, and cars going fast, one of our friends gets killed in a silly race by a rival racer who leaves the scene as our hero takes the rap for his friends death. Then the whole movie goes in a direction of our hero, and the rival racer finally meeting up again at a special, secret race in California so our hero can avenge his friends death, and be a big deal.
Aaron Paul and Imogene Poots star in this really ill-advised movie franchise that sadly, is set up for more. This is not Fast And Furious in any way, although clearly they would like to capitalize on it. This to its credit, and to its detriment, has a real video game to it. So the film makers would say mission accomplished. And I would say, great! Why come to this and watch this, when I can stay home in my shorts, save the 12 large, and actually play the game at my leisure. That is the big problem here. There's just no reason to go to this.
And with all that said, it's just so amazingly silly all the way through. Paul and Poots hold up their end, and do the best they can with what they are given. And what they are given, is a bad script bordering on horrible, that is more concerned with product placement, and being a huge commercial for Ford and many others. Paul has good things ahead for him, and Poots is certainly an interesting presence on screen, and like her. But there is just too much silliness mixed in.
Need For Speed. Play the game at home, and have more fun..way more.
This is based on the very popular video game, and now it's your chance to see it here on the big screen. Why? I am really not sure. This is just flat out a waste of time in about every single regard. Oh, there is some fancy driving in this movie that is to be respected, but about everything else about this movie is simply silly.
It's the "story" of a young motor-head from Mt. Kisco, New York who owns a racing shop, and drives in illegal street racing with his friends. They drive through their hometown in these amazing vintage muscle cars made 30 years before they were born. They spend their time risking everyones life in town as the roar through town at 100 plus mph, all while a friend is in the air in a private plane looking for trouble. No helmets, no seat belts, no one gets hurt, no cops, and no consequences.
He and his group a fellow racers, then hit the big time, and get involved in developing a special Shelby Mustang. (Yeah, I know.) So, then after we watch a few more silly races, and cars going fast, one of our friends gets killed in a silly race by a rival racer who leaves the scene as our hero takes the rap for his friends death. Then the whole movie goes in a direction of our hero, and the rival racer finally meeting up again at a special, secret race in California so our hero can avenge his friends death, and be a big deal.
Aaron Paul and Imogene Poots star in this really ill-advised movie franchise that sadly, is set up for more. This is not Fast And Furious in any way, although clearly they would like to capitalize on it. This to its credit, and to its detriment, has a real video game to it. So the film makers would say mission accomplished. And I would say, great! Why come to this and watch this, when I can stay home in my shorts, save the 12 large, and actually play the game at my leisure. That is the big problem here. There's just no reason to go to this.
And with all that said, it's just so amazingly silly all the way through. Paul and Poots hold up their end, and do the best they can with what they are given. And what they are given, is a bad script bordering on horrible, that is more concerned with product placement, and being a huge commercial for Ford and many others. Paul has good things ahead for him, and Poots is certainly an interesting presence on screen, and like her. But there is just too much silliness mixed in.
Need For Speed. Play the game at home, and have more fun..way more.
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Pulling Even
Be it rainy and gloomy today to get me thinking maybe a little deeper than normal, than would be it sunny. So goes today.
This time of year always reminds me of the fact that my father passed away many years ago when I was quite young at this time of the year. It's been so long, it doesn't really phase me as deeply anymore. Those difficult days have expired and graduated to simple, reflective remembrance. But this year, there is a new player in this quotient, as I will turn the exact age, he was when the sand ran out on him. And at the time - on me. This year, I pull even.
Admittedly, it has been on my mind since the ball dropped in Times Square two months ago. Hard not to. He was a big player in my life for a short, but meaningful time. I have never really thought about my own age at any time in my life, and I'm not really now. You are what you are. But I have thought more about his age, even though this year we pull even.
I told myself as a result of this evening of ages, I was going to reinvent some things about me that needed attending. I cut my hair shorter than it has ever been. I re-joined a gym. I have cleaned up my eating habits, and discovered that what I don't eat is more important than what I do. I've dropped some weight, and hope to drop more, with a commitment to getting in better shape. And I feel better than I have in a while. I even decided to spend some money on myself from time to time, something I have not always been good at, all while using all of my vacation time. Many of us are guilty of all of the above.
With my dad's and my ages pulling even, he has been on my mind a bit more than normal this year. Guess I still night be thinking that he looks out for me a bit, and may even be proud of me for the small changes. But if I remember him as I think I do, he would be more proud that I thought and recognized the changes that needed to be made, and not the change itself. I have been granted more time than him, and should use it wisely.
I did not follow in his footsteps with what I chose to dedicate my educational and professional life to. But I think few children really do. We all want to make our own footprints, and that's probably a good thing in the long run. But what doesn't change is the fact that no matter how old we are, and how much things do change, we would like to think that we make our parents proud.
I have come to learn after a few decades that possibly the two best things that have happened to me, are my dad living, and then my dad passing. He gave me many tools I needed for my life, and then I was asked to use them. Although possibly too soon to push on in that different direction than he was imagining. But it's OK.
With a bit of luck, it seems I will pass him later this year, and forge on to ages far beyond what he could not. And it will feel good to go where he was not permitted, not wishing for change of the past that can not be undone.
But instead for the future, and for the changes...that can.
This time of year always reminds me of the fact that my father passed away many years ago when I was quite young at this time of the year. It's been so long, it doesn't really phase me as deeply anymore. Those difficult days have expired and graduated to simple, reflective remembrance. But this year, there is a new player in this quotient, as I will turn the exact age, he was when the sand ran out on him. And at the time - on me. This year, I pull even.
Admittedly, it has been on my mind since the ball dropped in Times Square two months ago. Hard not to. He was a big player in my life for a short, but meaningful time. I have never really thought about my own age at any time in my life, and I'm not really now. You are what you are. But I have thought more about his age, even though this year we pull even.
I told myself as a result of this evening of ages, I was going to reinvent some things about me that needed attending. I cut my hair shorter than it has ever been. I re-joined a gym. I have cleaned up my eating habits, and discovered that what I don't eat is more important than what I do. I've dropped some weight, and hope to drop more, with a commitment to getting in better shape. And I feel better than I have in a while. I even decided to spend some money on myself from time to time, something I have not always been good at, all while using all of my vacation time. Many of us are guilty of all of the above.
With my dad's and my ages pulling even, he has been on my mind a bit more than normal this year. Guess I still night be thinking that he looks out for me a bit, and may even be proud of me for the small changes. But if I remember him as I think I do, he would be more proud that I thought and recognized the changes that needed to be made, and not the change itself. I have been granted more time than him, and should use it wisely.
I did not follow in his footsteps with what I chose to dedicate my educational and professional life to. But I think few children really do. We all want to make our own footprints, and that's probably a good thing in the long run. But what doesn't change is the fact that no matter how old we are, and how much things do change, we would like to think that we make our parents proud.
I have come to learn after a few decades that possibly the two best things that have happened to me, are my dad living, and then my dad passing. He gave me many tools I needed for my life, and then I was asked to use them. Although possibly too soon to push on in that different direction than he was imagining. But it's OK.
With a bit of luck, it seems I will pass him later this year, and forge on to ages far beyond what he could not. And it will feel good to go where he was not permitted, not wishing for change of the past that can not be undone.
But instead for the future, and for the changes...that can.
Monday, March 17, 2014
New This Week For Streaming And DVD
This week there is a nice crop of new movies for streaming, or DVD buying and rental. With movies becoming more accessible for home use more quickly now, it's almost like going to the movies at home, and for a great price. And with your big flat screen TV, it really is a great experience if the theaters are not your thing.
This week, some really big movies that maybe you didn't catch in theaters. But then, there is Frozen which you and your kids have probably seen 10,000 times already! I will link you back to my original review too so you can help make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit pay on your remote. So let's see what's out this week
New This Week
Frozen (G)
You have seen this a dozen times maybe, but today it makes it all the way to your living room. An undeniable smash hit. Great music and a good story that you'll watch every holiday from now on.
American Hustle (R)
For the adults. A fantastic cast put together for this timed piece back to the 1970's. Story a small time con artists that try to make the big time. Christian Bale, Bradley Cooper, Amy Adams, and Jennifer Lawrence. One of the best movies of 2013. Tons of Oscar nominations.
Saving Mr. Banks (PG-13)
A story you don't know with big stars you do. Tom Hanks, Emma Thompson, and Paul Giamtti star in the true story of Walt Disney and his attempt to negotiate the movie rights to make Mary Poppins with it's writer. Could be a bit overrated, but interesting.
Mandela: Long Road To Freedom (R)
Idris Elba is a great actor, and he is Mandela. This got lost at the theaters in the big movie rush Luckily, we can watch it at home now.
scott@wqmx.com
This week, some really big movies that maybe you didn't catch in theaters. But then, there is Frozen which you and your kids have probably seen 10,000 times already! I will link you back to my original review too so you can help make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit pay on your remote. So let's see what's out this week
New This Week
Frozen (G)
You have seen this a dozen times maybe, but today it makes it all the way to your living room. An undeniable smash hit. Great music and a good story that you'll watch every holiday from now on.
American Hustle (R)
For the adults. A fantastic cast put together for this timed piece back to the 1970's. Story a small time con artists that try to make the big time. Christian Bale, Bradley Cooper, Amy Adams, and Jennifer Lawrence. One of the best movies of 2013. Tons of Oscar nominations.
Saving Mr. Banks (PG-13)
A story you don't know with big stars you do. Tom Hanks, Emma Thompson, and Paul Giamtti star in the true story of Walt Disney and his attempt to negotiate the movie rights to make Mary Poppins with it's writer. Could be a bit overrated, but interesting.
Mandela: Long Road To Freedom (R)
Idris Elba is a great actor, and he is Mandela. This got lost at the theaters in the big movie rush Luckily, we can watch it at home now.
scott@wqmx.com
DVD - New on DVD and Streaming
This week we have a wide array of DVD releases that are primarily for adults. Most of these received a ton of critical success, but most here had underachieving box office success. In case you missed these because of your busy schedule during the late year release dates and holiday running around, you can link back to my original review from the theater run.
Hopefully, this will help you make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit that play button on your remote. Be mindful, these are only the major theater releases, and not TV series, or older movies making their way onto DVD or Blu-Ray as well this week.
New For You This Week
Out Of The Furnace (R)
This hard as nails drama has a star-studded cast including Christian Bale, Zoe Saldana, and others. A tough look at many aspects of small town America that have been decimated by recession, broken promises, and an era gone by.
Homefront (R)
Jason Stathum stars in his annual action flick. This too has a nice cast, and was written by Sylvester Stallone.
The Book Thief (PG-13)
This huge book came to the big screen with tons of hype at years end. As good as this story is, the movie was lost in end of the year hype at the movies. WWII story set in the heart of Nazi occupied Europe.
Inside Llewyn Davis (R)
The remarkable Coen Brothers and their 2013 offering. Very well received by critics, not so much by the fans. Never really got to huge release.
scott@wqmx.com
Hopefully, this will help you make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit that play button on your remote. Be mindful, these are only the major theater releases, and not TV series, or older movies making their way onto DVD or Blu-Ray as well this week.
New For You This Week
Out Of The Furnace (R)
This hard as nails drama has a star-studded cast including Christian Bale, Zoe Saldana, and others. A tough look at many aspects of small town America that have been decimated by recession, broken promises, and an era gone by.
Homefront (R)
Jason Stathum stars in his annual action flick. This too has a nice cast, and was written by Sylvester Stallone.
The Book Thief (PG-13)
This huge book came to the big screen with tons of hype at years end. As good as this story is, the movie was lost in end of the year hype at the movies. WWII story set in the heart of Nazi occupied Europe.
Inside Llewyn Davis (R)
The remarkable Coen Brothers and their 2013 offering. Very well received by critics, not so much by the fans. Never really got to huge release.
scott@wqmx.com
MOVIE REVIEW - Mr. Peabody And Sherman
Generally, I don't review too many animated movies. There are way too many of them, most have the same formula. And really, what are you going to say about a most of these movies? They are a built in love fest before they hit theaters.
Enter Mr. Peabody And Sherman. For most who see this, they will have no idea this was a cartoon in the 1960's that was part of the Rocky and Bullwinkle franchise. (Who?) Anyway, 50 years later with incredible animation techniques and an unending and salacious appetite for animated movies, this has made it to the theaters.
Mr. Peabody is a dog that is a genius. He is blessed with immense intelligence and lives with his "son" Sherman, who is a young boy. Peabody is world famous and has invented all kinds of amazing things in his incredible house, including the "Way Back." The Way Back, is a time machine that is kept as a secret with Sherman, and together they take amazing journeys to important times past in history. And that's what they do here.
This has been updated for today's world, in both story lines, relevance, and in movie making. This is a fast paced, action based and for the most part pretty fun. They spend a few minutes up front explaining to the novices who Peabody is, and how he and Sherman came to be family. They create a fun Peabody that is intelligent, and barks out incredibly difficult dialogue for most of this movie. This is not some Disney, 4th grade singing and dancing flick. This is actually kind of a thinking man's animated movie, and that should be applauded. Oh yeah, don't panic! There of course is some silly "poop" humor here. Whew! (Gotta have that.) But overall this has a brain.
These two and others fly off to actually important historical times, and through fun, slick animation, and a terrific musical soundtrack, slightly expose us to things that most animated movies do not. Overall this is pretty fun and imaginative. A strong list of celebrity voices too, gives this a nice lift. Is this perfect? Well, no. But it is pretty fun. A bit ADD at times, but enjoyable for young and old alike.
Mr. Peabody And Sherman. No matter if you remember him or not, fun.
Enter Mr. Peabody And Sherman. For most who see this, they will have no idea this was a cartoon in the 1960's that was part of the Rocky and Bullwinkle franchise. (Who?) Anyway, 50 years later with incredible animation techniques and an unending and salacious appetite for animated movies, this has made it to the theaters.
Mr. Peabody is a dog that is a genius. He is blessed with immense intelligence and lives with his "son" Sherman, who is a young boy. Peabody is world famous and has invented all kinds of amazing things in his incredible house, including the "Way Back." The Way Back, is a time machine that is kept as a secret with Sherman, and together they take amazing journeys to important times past in history. And that's what they do here.
This has been updated for today's world, in both story lines, relevance, and in movie making. This is a fast paced, action based and for the most part pretty fun. They spend a few minutes up front explaining to the novices who Peabody is, and how he and Sherman came to be family. They create a fun Peabody that is intelligent, and barks out incredibly difficult dialogue for most of this movie. This is not some Disney, 4th grade singing and dancing flick. This is actually kind of a thinking man's animated movie, and that should be applauded. Oh yeah, don't panic! There of course is some silly "poop" humor here. Whew! (Gotta have that.) But overall this has a brain.
These two and others fly off to actually important historical times, and through fun, slick animation, and a terrific musical soundtrack, slightly expose us to things that most animated movies do not. Overall this is pretty fun and imaginative. A strong list of celebrity voices too, gives this a nice lift. Is this perfect? Well, no. But it is pretty fun. A bit ADD at times, but enjoyable for young and old alike.
Mr. Peabody And Sherman. No matter if you remember him or not, fun.
Saturday, March 15, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - The Single Moms Club
Tyler Perry is making a ton of films these days. And The Single Mom's Club makes another case that he is probably making too many.
The SMC, is about 5 single women in modern society that are raising children on their own, for various reasons. In each case, the father is not known, or around to help out sufficiently or at all. And in some cases is actually hindering the parenting process. These women are from all walks of life, and mixed ethnicity's giving this a real diverse feel which is necessary. The women all become friends by way of a school discipline of all of their kids. The women who don't know one another have to work together on a school dance as punishment.
Along the line, the women develop a bond as they all have many things in common. They become friends and form this club they call, The Single Moms Club, where they support each other and help each other move on with every day things, and help each other move forward. If this sounds uninteresting, you would be right. Although, this is a movie that the vast majority of those who go will like, and the critics will hate.
One thing that is undeniable about this, the various story lines are relevant to many single women. That is worth applause and gives this a bit of cred. But there are just simply far too many problems here to save it. Perry, who has a part in this movie, has a movie formula that works though. Make them quick, and on a budget, in one area and make them as topical as possible. They generate him a pile of money, and that's fine. But the quality of the sheer quantity of the movies he is making, is really starting to suffer.
This is written poorly overall. And being brutally honest, there is some horrendous acting in this movie. I mean, like whoa! There are far too many characters, and and way too many sub plots to really keep you focused. This tries to be a drama at times and a comedy at times, and it's neither. What this is, is a movie that is begging a certain sect to go see it, and they will. And because of the relatability they will like this. But I think what they will actually like, is singularly the subject of this movie, and not the actual movie.
A bunch of the attempted humor is simply awful. Really childish stuff by and large, and so old and over done it just doesn't work. All being attempted by actors who don't specialize at improvisational humor on camera. And it sticks out like a sore thumb. Many of the situations are ridiculously stereotypical, and insulting to your intelligence. In short, this looks like it was thrown together quickly, and without a great deal of money. The very formula that made Perry a reputable film maker is starting to catch up with him. The past few projects have really looked cheap, and quick, and that's a shame.
The Single Moms Club. Just not good.
The SMC, is about 5 single women in modern society that are raising children on their own, for various reasons. In each case, the father is not known, or around to help out sufficiently or at all. And in some cases is actually hindering the parenting process. These women are from all walks of life, and mixed ethnicity's giving this a real diverse feel which is necessary. The women all become friends by way of a school discipline of all of their kids. The women who don't know one another have to work together on a school dance as punishment.
Along the line, the women develop a bond as they all have many things in common. They become friends and form this club they call, The Single Moms Club, where they support each other and help each other move on with every day things, and help each other move forward. If this sounds uninteresting, you would be right. Although, this is a movie that the vast majority of those who go will like, and the critics will hate.
One thing that is undeniable about this, the various story lines are relevant to many single women. That is worth applause and gives this a bit of cred. But there are just simply far too many problems here to save it. Perry, who has a part in this movie, has a movie formula that works though. Make them quick, and on a budget, in one area and make them as topical as possible. They generate him a pile of money, and that's fine. But the quality of the sheer quantity of the movies he is making, is really starting to suffer.
This is written poorly overall. And being brutally honest, there is some horrendous acting in this movie. I mean, like whoa! There are far too many characters, and and way too many sub plots to really keep you focused. This tries to be a drama at times and a comedy at times, and it's neither. What this is, is a movie that is begging a certain sect to go see it, and they will. And because of the relatability they will like this. But I think what they will actually like, is singularly the subject of this movie, and not the actual movie.
A bunch of the attempted humor is simply awful. Really childish stuff by and large, and so old and over done it just doesn't work. All being attempted by actors who don't specialize at improvisational humor on camera. And it sticks out like a sore thumb. Many of the situations are ridiculously stereotypical, and insulting to your intelligence. In short, this looks like it was thrown together quickly, and without a great deal of money. The very formula that made Perry a reputable film maker is starting to catch up with him. The past few projects have really looked cheap, and quick, and that's a shame.
The Single Moms Club. Just not good.
Friday, March 7, 2014
New On DVD and Streaming
Understanding that not all get to go to the theaters to see the latest movies, this week we will look at the hottest DVD and streaming movies that are out. We will look at only major DVD and movie releases and not TV series, or older movies finally making their way onto Blu-Ray.
Since movies are released faster than ever to home viewing formats, you really are not all that far behind. I will post these on Tuesdays, as that is the day most new DVD's and streaming begin. I will also link you back to my written review of that movie in the theater to help you make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit pay on your remote.
New This Week
Hunger Games:Catching Fire (PG-13)
The second in the Hunger Game series, and where the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman made his debut.
12 Years A Slave (R)
Won the Oscar last week for Best Picture. This is a harsh movie that won't be suitable for everyone.
Oldboy (R)
Josh Brolin, and the wonderful Elizabeth Olsen star on one of the strangest movies of the year. This is a small Independent movie that will is an acquired taste for sure.
scott@wqmx.com
Since movies are released faster than ever to home viewing formats, you really are not all that far behind. I will post these on Tuesdays, as that is the day most new DVD's and streaming begin. I will also link you back to my written review of that movie in the theater to help you make an informed decision before you rent, buy, or hit pay on your remote.
New This Week
Hunger Games:Catching Fire (PG-13)
The second in the Hunger Game series, and where the late Phillip Seymour Hoffman made his debut.
12 Years A Slave (R)
Won the Oscar last week for Best Picture. This is a harsh movie that won't be suitable for everyone.
Oldboy (R)
Josh Brolin, and the wonderful Elizabeth Olsen star on one of the strangest movies of the year. This is a small Independent movie that will is an acquired taste for sure.
scott@wqmx.com
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - Son Of God
Son Of God is the first in a new wave of Biblical movies that are coming this year. Noah is next officially, with some more faith based movies sprinkled in.
Son Of God is the story of adult Jesus and his disciples, as they walk from city to city, spreading the word that Jesus is indeed the son of God. It chronicles many Biblical stories even the most casual church goer would know. It takes us from Jesus meeting, and befriending Peter, to Mary, and the rest of the faithful followers, all of them hoping that Jesus is in fact, the Messiah.
The story then takes us to Jerusalem, where Jesus of course is finally arrested and charged with religious high crimes by the high priests against the church. This takes us through the trial and crucifying of Jesus, and eventually to his rising three days later. And then beyond.
Son Of God is told very simply and easily and that is to its credit. A good decision here, was to make this a "pure" movie. This is not a big special effect laden take on the ancient story. It is told nicely through dialogue, and easy to follow Biblical stories. It has a very good cast, most are relative unknowns and that was the movies best decision. That helped keep this very authentic, and help you focus on the characters and movie message instead of Hollywood stars.
This checks in at 2 hours and 20 minutes and being honest, it is way too long. Much of this could have been shortened down, especially the death sequence both leading up to, and after it. And with full disclosure, that area of the movie is very graphic, bloody, and could be a bit too intense for some. It is not as brutal as The Passion Of The Christ a few years ago, but nonetheless, it is tough to watch at times. It does though, leave at the end with a sense of hope, that you might expect.
Son Of God. This has problems and is definitely not perfect. But it is good timing as we head into the Easter season. A big alternative to the rest of the box office right now, and this will find an audience. We need all kinds of movies for all kinds of audiences. This will bring people to the movies, who never go, and that's a good thing period. Certainly a niche movie, as some will not even consider going to this, while others may see this multiple times.
Son Of God is the story of adult Jesus and his disciples, as they walk from city to city, spreading the word that Jesus is indeed the son of God. It chronicles many Biblical stories even the most casual church goer would know. It takes us from Jesus meeting, and befriending Peter, to Mary, and the rest of the faithful followers, all of them hoping that Jesus is in fact, the Messiah.
The story then takes us to Jerusalem, where Jesus of course is finally arrested and charged with religious high crimes by the high priests against the church. This takes us through the trial and crucifying of Jesus, and eventually to his rising three days later. And then beyond.
Son Of God is told very simply and easily and that is to its credit. A good decision here, was to make this a "pure" movie. This is not a big special effect laden take on the ancient story. It is told nicely through dialogue, and easy to follow Biblical stories. It has a very good cast, most are relative unknowns and that was the movies best decision. That helped keep this very authentic, and help you focus on the characters and movie message instead of Hollywood stars.
This checks in at 2 hours and 20 minutes and being honest, it is way too long. Much of this could have been shortened down, especially the death sequence both leading up to, and after it. And with full disclosure, that area of the movie is very graphic, bloody, and could be a bit too intense for some. It is not as brutal as The Passion Of The Christ a few years ago, but nonetheless, it is tough to watch at times. It does though, leave at the end with a sense of hope, that you might expect.
Son Of God. This has problems and is definitely not perfect. But it is good timing as we head into the Easter season. A big alternative to the rest of the box office right now, and this will find an audience. We need all kinds of movies for all kinds of audiences. This will bring people to the movies, who never go, and that's a good thing period. Certainly a niche movie, as some will not even consider going to this, while others may see this multiple times.
Saturday, March 1, 2014
MOVIE REVIEW - Non-Stop
I am a Liam Neeson fan. He has successfully reinvented himself as this middle-aged, semi believable common man, action hero over the past few years. And the Taken series (of which there will a another) has been a big success.
But Non-Stop is an interesting idea for a mid-winter action movie, with it focusing on United States Air Marshall's. Of course, they are undercover, and are on every flight in the U.S.. This is sort of a story of who they are, and a airliner disaster story, and a movie that deals with the real threat of terrorism that sadly still exists on every flight, try as we might. But this is where the set up is going to end, as this has a sad and for some, a bothersome storyline.
Neeson plays an Air Marshall, Bill. In the opening scene before he gets on a trans-Atlantic flight as Marshall, they establish this him as a fragile, chain smoking, drunken, depressed, divorced, not kept, suicidal, sad excuse of a man. Understanding you have to invent an interesting character for the movie, but I hardly think that is the typical United States Air Marshall. Because this is an action movie, he really isn't all that horrible of a Marshall, and somehow finds a way to save the day. That is not a spoiler, you know Liam Neeson is not going to die in this movie. And for some reason Julianne Moore is in this movie, but she is not needed. Her part is so small, could have been handled by anyone. Plus, she sells no tickets to any movie - anywhere.
The flight to London from the U.S., has been silently taken over by someone who has calculated this to the nines. They are demanding 150 million dollars into an account that bears Bill's name. The whole idea is to frame him for the crime of hijacking this plane and make him responsible for the deaths of everyone that will be killed on this flight one way or another, while they get away with the money. So, who on this flight is actually the hijacker? That is Non-Stop.
Non-Stop do a degree is basically just that. It paces along quite well, with enough happening on screen to hold your interest for the most part. Some of this is of course silly, and far-fetched, but hey, it's an action movie. They do a fairly good job of creating characters as the movie rolls along that make the soup a little tastier. And Neeson, although he kind of plays the same character for the most part he does in Taken, is fine.
But, they are not very cunning in making you guess who the bad guy really is. They blow that early in the movie and I don't think they know that. Also, many people who pay to see this will be put back, and possibly offended when they find out who the "bad guys" really are. It simply will not sit well with many. And in the end, that is part of movie making. Trying to create polarizing moments and characters to attempt to make things more intersting.
But that is the big failure of this movie. The writers took the easiest way out imaginable. They didn't think to take the time to create a villain that is original, and complex, and has his/her own story that would have taken some thought and imagination. That was the absolute strength of the blockbuster, Captain Phillips. They took the time, and used their creativity to make a villain with his own story that was interesting and powerful, and to a degree empathetic. It takes vision and talent to write that well, that just doesn't fly here, no pun intended. The bad guys are just an after thought. Glaring flaw of the movie, and it's not really recoverable. Lazy, stale writing.
Non-Stop. In the end too formula, too predictable, and too easy to really be good. Opportunity wasted. Fair at best.
But Non-Stop is an interesting idea for a mid-winter action movie, with it focusing on United States Air Marshall's. Of course, they are undercover, and are on every flight in the U.S.. This is sort of a story of who they are, and a airliner disaster story, and a movie that deals with the real threat of terrorism that sadly still exists on every flight, try as we might. But this is where the set up is going to end, as this has a sad and for some, a bothersome storyline.
Neeson plays an Air Marshall, Bill. In the opening scene before he gets on a trans-Atlantic flight as Marshall, they establish this him as a fragile, chain smoking, drunken, depressed, divorced, not kept, suicidal, sad excuse of a man. Understanding you have to invent an interesting character for the movie, but I hardly think that is the typical United States Air Marshall. Because this is an action movie, he really isn't all that horrible of a Marshall, and somehow finds a way to save the day. That is not a spoiler, you know Liam Neeson is not going to die in this movie. And for some reason Julianne Moore is in this movie, but she is not needed. Her part is so small, could have been handled by anyone. Plus, she sells no tickets to any movie - anywhere.
The flight to London from the U.S., has been silently taken over by someone who has calculated this to the nines. They are demanding 150 million dollars into an account that bears Bill's name. The whole idea is to frame him for the crime of hijacking this plane and make him responsible for the deaths of everyone that will be killed on this flight one way or another, while they get away with the money. So, who on this flight is actually the hijacker? That is Non-Stop.
Non-Stop do a degree is basically just that. It paces along quite well, with enough happening on screen to hold your interest for the most part. Some of this is of course silly, and far-fetched, but hey, it's an action movie. They do a fairly good job of creating characters as the movie rolls along that make the soup a little tastier. And Neeson, although he kind of plays the same character for the most part he does in Taken, is fine.
But, they are not very cunning in making you guess who the bad guy really is. They blow that early in the movie and I don't think they know that. Also, many people who pay to see this will be put back, and possibly offended when they find out who the "bad guys" really are. It simply will not sit well with many. And in the end, that is part of movie making. Trying to create polarizing moments and characters to attempt to make things more intersting.
But that is the big failure of this movie. The writers took the easiest way out imaginable. They didn't think to take the time to create a villain that is original, and complex, and has his/her own story that would have taken some thought and imagination. That was the absolute strength of the blockbuster, Captain Phillips. They took the time, and used their creativity to make a villain with his own story that was interesting and powerful, and to a degree empathetic. It takes vision and talent to write that well, that just doesn't fly here, no pun intended. The bad guys are just an after thought. Glaring flaw of the movie, and it's not really recoverable. Lazy, stale writing.
Non-Stop. In the end too formula, too predictable, and too easy to really be good. Opportunity wasted. Fair at best.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
