We're just a few days away from the Academy Awards in Hollywood. I know there are a ton of awards shows, but the Oscars always seem to be the most anticipated awards of the year. This year the Academy has changed a few things, most notably they now have ten pictures nominated for Best Picture.
So I thought we'd do the same kind of preview we do each year with a twist of our own. In the five major categories, Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Actress, Supporting Actor, and Supporting Actress, we'll make three picks. The Academy pick. Who I think the Academy will pick as the winner. I'll make my choice as the best performance of the year. Then we'll make an adjustment of our own, like the Academy. I'll give you a "dark horse" choice. Someone to keep an eye on, that might just sneak in there and take the prize.
Best Picture:
The Academy winner - Avatar. As imaginative as it is, I'm starting to feel with all the animated
movies the past decade and more all the time, they should have their own
major award. Too much success, and money. The Academy won't be able
to resist.
I would pick - Up In The Air. A movie for our time, told honestly, and with terrific actors
delivering really great performances. A story you've never seen, and a movie
that makes you think.
Dark Horse pick - The Hurt Locker. This is a powerful, emotional story about real soldiers
doing real stressful work in Iraq. It's also a story you've never seen, done
extremely well. Sometimes movies like this are a real surprise at the Oscars.
Best Actor:
The Academy pick - Jeff Bridges in Crazy Heart. He's already won the Golden Globe for this
role.
I would pick - Jeff Bridges in Crazy Heart. This is the performance of a lifetime . He is
simply fantastic!
Dark Horse pick - Morgan Freeman in Invictus. He is great as Nelson Mandela. Big role.
Best Actress:
The Academy pick - Sandra Bullock in The Blind Side. This is the definitive moment for her.
It's her time to win and the Academy I think will recognize that. She is
great and this is the jewel of her long and successful career.
I would pick - Sandra Bullock. She reinvented herself for this role, and I'm hoping this
is the start of a new Sandra Bullock.
Dark Horse pick - Gabourey Sidibe in Precious. So well acclaimed and she was
great.
Best Supporting Actor:
The Academy pick - Christoph Walz in Inglorious Basterds. Quentin Tarantino movies
many times are very well liked by Hollywood. He is the gas in the engine
of this movie.
I would pick - Christoph Walz. He is so good in this movie. Compelling, scary, funny, and the
amount of dialogue and multiple languages spoken. Just fantastic.
Dark Horse pick - Stanley Tucci in The Lovely Bones. Great performance as a really creepy
stalker in this very popular movie. You really hate his character in this
movie. Really well done.
Best Supporting Actress:
The Academy Pick - Penelope Cruz in 9. Hollywood loves movies like 9, and she was really,
really good. They won't be able to help themselves. She'll win.
I would pick - Anna Kendrick in Up In The Air. She was so good in her role as an Ivy League
know-it-all, know nothing young executive. When she was on camera, this was
a better movie. Great job!
Dark Horse pick - Anna Kendrick. She has an outside shot, but Cruz is too much this year.
The Oscars are this Sunday. Pop up the popcorn and get ready to cheer on your favorites. We'll review the show next week
E-mail me your thoughts - scott@wqmx.com
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Saturday, February 27, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - The Crazies
Here comes The Crazies! A remake of a a 1973 cult classic, and given a modern day spin for a new generation of scary movie buffs.
The Crazies is one of those movies that doesn't boast huge stars, and it doesn't need them. It's also a scary movie that for the most part doesn't rely on huge special effects to make it's point. The Crazies is actually pretty straight forward and honest. It doesn't try to flower up this story just because it could. I have to say by and large, The Crazies for what it is, is pretty good!
It's the story of a fictional Iowa small town that has about 1,200 people. For some reason some of them start acting "crazy." What that actually means in this movie, is that some are just walking around zombie-like and intent on killing others. It starts off mild enough, but quickly turns into a town- wide epidemic. Leaving the local town sheriff, his wife, and small staff left to figure this whole thing out and stay alive long enough to get out of town and to safety.
Why are these people going crazy? Why is the American military suddenly involved? These are the crazy questions, in The Crazies!
For what it is, there is something about this movie that works. I have to give it props on the fact that it's a movie and not a cartoon, relying on animated special effects to make it's point. There is plenty of old fashioned violence here, but this is a movie about nutty people stricken with some problem that are bent on killing people. There are some scenes that will tough for some to watch. But this is a movie meant for a young, thrill happy audience and they will be amazed how compelling a movie can be that is simply a movie and not a video game.
But let's not get carried away here. The Crazies is not going to be standing on the brink of Oscar greatness. It will be relatively forgettable over time. But if you're looking for a quick thrill on a cold and snowy weekend night with a bunch of friends, The Crazies may be your movie. And the later your showtime, the scarier it will be.
Movies like The Crazies have to be reviewed on what they are. This movie is supposed to give you a jolt and a thrill, and be entertaining for thrill-seeking young movie goers that want a good rush. And trying to do so without being completely ridiculous, predictable or stupid.
Call me crazy......but The Crazies....is that movie.
The Crazies is one of those movies that doesn't boast huge stars, and it doesn't need them. It's also a scary movie that for the most part doesn't rely on huge special effects to make it's point. The Crazies is actually pretty straight forward and honest. It doesn't try to flower up this story just because it could. I have to say by and large, The Crazies for what it is, is pretty good!
It's the story of a fictional Iowa small town that has about 1,200 people. For some reason some of them start acting "crazy." What that actually means in this movie, is that some are just walking around zombie-like and intent on killing others. It starts off mild enough, but quickly turns into a town- wide epidemic. Leaving the local town sheriff, his wife, and small staff left to figure this whole thing out and stay alive long enough to get out of town and to safety.
Why are these people going crazy? Why is the American military suddenly involved? These are the crazy questions, in The Crazies!
For what it is, there is something about this movie that works. I have to give it props on the fact that it's a movie and not a cartoon, relying on animated special effects to make it's point. There is plenty of old fashioned violence here, but this is a movie about nutty people stricken with some problem that are bent on killing people. There are some scenes that will tough for some to watch. But this is a movie meant for a young, thrill happy audience and they will be amazed how compelling a movie can be that is simply a movie and not a video game.
But let's not get carried away here. The Crazies is not going to be standing on the brink of Oscar greatness. It will be relatively forgettable over time. But if you're looking for a quick thrill on a cold and snowy weekend night with a bunch of friends, The Crazies may be your movie. And the later your showtime, the scarier it will be.
Movies like The Crazies have to be reviewed on what they are. This movie is supposed to give you a jolt and a thrill, and be entertaining for thrill-seeking young movie goers that want a good rush. And trying to do so without being completely ridiculous, predictable or stupid.
Call me crazy......but The Crazies....is that movie.
Friday, February 26, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - Cop Out
When you see the trailer for the new Bruce Willis action - comedy Cop Out, you might think this could be a pretty good movie. Might be some fun here, and this could be a pretty good night at the movies. Well, it's not Gone With The Wind.
Cop Out stars Willis, and Tracy Morgan as two cops in New York that have been partnered up for 9 years. They do things "their" way. You know, renegade detectives with no rules and not very well liked by their superiors. Now that the basic stage is set let's talk about the actual story. Well, that's a completely different challenge.
Cop Out is what you might think it is. If you've seen the commercials, you've pretty much seen the movie. It comes off as a series of scenes that are are sort of like small comedy skits designed for big laughs. They are then pasted back to back thinking you'll just giggle from one sketch to the next. And in fairness, there are some laughs here. Willis and Morgan do pull off some fun and there is some amusement here. But after you realize there is only one joke being told, it gets old in a hurry.
There really is no story per say. But what there is, are a few laughs, a few chuckles, a bunch of gun play violence and a whole boatload of real bad language. And I mean all the words are said time and time again. The constant use of huge profanity gets very fatiguing after a while, but this is a large, new Hollywood trend over the past few years. Cop Out is made for young adults, and Hollywood must honestly believe that the young people today must want to hear incessant horrible language, because Cop Out is not the first comedy to go down this road.
Sad part is that Morgan at times can really be a funny guy But he's asked to cuss a lot and say the same things over and over, and it sells his talent short. Willis, with a shaved head, is somewhat of a parody of himself from the Die Hard series. He is who he is. Toss in a hip soundtrack and an underwhelming supporting cast, and Cop Out staggers around for an a hour and forty minutes, then falls over at last to it's eternal resting place.
There will be those who howl at Cop Out, as any movie can somehow find it's audience. This could have been so much better if it had been bold enough to try something new. But It doesn't. It sells out to cheap attempts at cheap laughs. For many Cop Out, will strike out!
Cop Out stars Willis, and Tracy Morgan as two cops in New York that have been partnered up for 9 years. They do things "their" way. You know, renegade detectives with no rules and not very well liked by their superiors. Now that the basic stage is set let's talk about the actual story. Well, that's a completely different challenge.
Cop Out is what you might think it is. If you've seen the commercials, you've pretty much seen the movie. It comes off as a series of scenes that are are sort of like small comedy skits designed for big laughs. They are then pasted back to back thinking you'll just giggle from one sketch to the next. And in fairness, there are some laughs here. Willis and Morgan do pull off some fun and there is some amusement here. But after you realize there is only one joke being told, it gets old in a hurry.
There really is no story per say. But what there is, are a few laughs, a few chuckles, a bunch of gun play violence and a whole boatload of real bad language. And I mean all the words are said time and time again. The constant use of huge profanity gets very fatiguing after a while, but this is a large, new Hollywood trend over the past few years. Cop Out is made for young adults, and Hollywood must honestly believe that the young people today must want to hear incessant horrible language, because Cop Out is not the first comedy to go down this road.
Sad part is that Morgan at times can really be a funny guy But he's asked to cuss a lot and say the same things over and over, and it sells his talent short. Willis, with a shaved head, is somewhat of a parody of himself from the Die Hard series. He is who he is. Toss in a hip soundtrack and an underwhelming supporting cast, and Cop Out staggers around for an a hour and forty minutes, then falls over at last to it's eternal resting place.
There will be those who howl at Cop Out, as any movie can somehow find it's audience. This could have been so much better if it had been bold enough to try something new. But It doesn't. It sells out to cheap attempts at cheap laughs. For many Cop Out, will strike out!
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Wishbone Italian
One of the real fun things about all the social network websites is that you can see what kinds of things people respond to. Some serious of course, but a lot of it is just fun stuff.
For a while now, one of the jokes Sue Wilson and I have had on our show has been the old "I'm eating a sandwich" status update. People do put boring updates like that up, and we laugh at them. But this week I saw an update that made me take notice. A friend of ours statused, "Still cut my sandwiches into 4 pieces...go ahead laugh" OK, this was from an adult. And it made me smile. Then after she got a ton of agreeable comments about this childood memory, it got me thinking. There are those things from when we were kids that stay with us - always.
I have no idea if she had the sandwich epiphany at that very moment, or if she's always known that's how she rolls with her bread, and it doesn't matter. It got me thinking about memories of my own. The really good, and the not that good. A food, a smell, a habit, or a little thing like the 4 slicer sandwich. What has stuck with you all these years.? I came up with a few. All in fun.
The really good? Cinnamon rolls cooking. Even the cheap ones, 8 to a silver tin. Man, takes me all the way back. We didn't always have them, so it was a treat. To this day when I get a whiff I'm on on a mission. Gang way, and heads up! I will NOT be denied. They're going down... to my stomach. You want some? Go to the store and buy some more.
Raisin bread toast. Raisin bread is only good for one thing. Toast. Can't imagine making a sandwich out of it, no matter how many slices you cut it into. Bologna on raisin bread? I'm guessing not.
Feet tucked tight in the bottom of the bed. Yep, I'm a tight feet - bed guy. Love the feel of my feet jammed in there tight, just like when I was a kid. I know it's not everyones favorite, and I can sleep in a floppy feet bed.....but I prefer the tight sheet - feet thing.
Those are the good. Now for the one that's not as good.
Wishbone Italian Salad Dressing. Haven't eaten it in 30 years. When I was a kid, we only had one kind of salad at the house. Iceberg lettuce in a bowl, maybe a slice of tomato or two and Wishbone Italian. It wasn't until I started dating a girl named Sherri when I was 18, that I even knew that there was another kind of dressing! I'd go over there for dinner, and there was about 7 kinds on the table. I couldn't believe my eyes. Thousand Island, Blue Cheese, French, Hidden Valley Ranch? C'mon!!!!!!!!! Are you serious???? I was so excited I think I may have drunk from the bottle a time or two!
I may have even shoveled in a few ladles of Marzettis creamy cucumber straight from the wide mouthed jar into my wider mouth even before the salad showed up. And the salad? They were huge...piled high with bushel baskets of veggies, complete with romaine lettuce and.....cheese.....bacon bits.......and even those crunchy things you shake out of the shaker that no one knows the name of! I have kept my passion for salads and for creamy dressings And I sadly, have forever forgone the Wishbone Italian.
I have nothing against the Wishbone people per say. Probably a very nice family. But I'm afraid I am scarred for life. I simply bypass the Wishbone section and head off to greener salad pastures and graze in the Kens Steakhouse, or Marzettis, or Stancatos aisle ...and always creamy. I also hate to lump in all Wishbone into one category, but I have to. It's a shame, they could be 10 for a dollar, and I still would be out!
So let's all take a trip back and remember the days of cinnamon rolls, tucked in feet and 4 slicer sandwiches. Being a kid was pretty good, and we should take all the good with us. And slice those sandwiches up with pride, or cut off the crust or whatever you did or still do. And pass it on to the next generation.
Just hold the Wishbone Italian!
For a while now, one of the jokes Sue Wilson and I have had on our show has been the old "I'm eating a sandwich" status update. People do put boring updates like that up, and we laugh at them. But this week I saw an update that made me take notice. A friend of ours statused, "Still cut my sandwiches into 4 pieces...go ahead laugh" OK, this was from an adult. And it made me smile. Then after she got a ton of agreeable comments about this childood memory, it got me thinking. There are those things from when we were kids that stay with us - always.
I have no idea if she had the sandwich epiphany at that very moment, or if she's always known that's how she rolls with her bread, and it doesn't matter. It got me thinking about memories of my own. The really good, and the not that good. A food, a smell, a habit, or a little thing like the 4 slicer sandwich. What has stuck with you all these years.? I came up with a few. All in fun.
The really good? Cinnamon rolls cooking. Even the cheap ones, 8 to a silver tin. Man, takes me all the way back. We didn't always have them, so it was a treat. To this day when I get a whiff I'm on on a mission. Gang way, and heads up! I will NOT be denied. They're going down... to my stomach. You want some? Go to the store and buy some more.
Raisin bread toast. Raisin bread is only good for one thing. Toast. Can't imagine making a sandwich out of it, no matter how many slices you cut it into. Bologna on raisin bread? I'm guessing not.
Feet tucked tight in the bottom of the bed. Yep, I'm a tight feet - bed guy. Love the feel of my feet jammed in there tight, just like when I was a kid. I know it's not everyones favorite, and I can sleep in a floppy feet bed.....but I prefer the tight sheet - feet thing.
Those are the good. Now for the one that's not as good.
Wishbone Italian Salad Dressing. Haven't eaten it in 30 years. When I was a kid, we only had one kind of salad at the house. Iceberg lettuce in a bowl, maybe a slice of tomato or two and Wishbone Italian. It wasn't until I started dating a girl named Sherri when I was 18, that I even knew that there was another kind of dressing! I'd go over there for dinner, and there was about 7 kinds on the table. I couldn't believe my eyes. Thousand Island, Blue Cheese, French, Hidden Valley Ranch? C'mon!!!!!!!!! Are you serious???? I was so excited I think I may have drunk from the bottle a time or two!
I may have even shoveled in a few ladles of Marzettis creamy cucumber straight from the wide mouthed jar into my wider mouth even before the salad showed up. And the salad? They were huge...piled high with bushel baskets of veggies, complete with romaine lettuce and.....cheese.....bacon bits.......and even those crunchy things you shake out of the shaker that no one knows the name of! I have kept my passion for salads and for creamy dressings And I sadly, have forever forgone the Wishbone Italian.
I have nothing against the Wishbone people per say. Probably a very nice family. But I'm afraid I am scarred for life. I simply bypass the Wishbone section and head off to greener salad pastures and graze in the Kens Steakhouse, or Marzettis, or Stancatos aisle ...and always creamy. I also hate to lump in all Wishbone into one category, but I have to. It's a shame, they could be 10 for a dollar, and I still would be out!
So let's all take a trip back and remember the days of cinnamon rolls, tucked in feet and 4 slicer sandwiches. Being a kid was pretty good, and we should take all the good with us. And slice those sandwiches up with pride, or cut off the crust or whatever you did or still do. And pass it on to the next generation.
Just hold the Wishbone Italian!
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Tiger Pause
It seemed the whole world stopped for a few minutes as Tiger Woods spoke and paused his way through his first public appearance in 3 months on Friday. The reviews came pouring in. Some positive, equal number negative. Seems split at this point.
First off, I am not a Tiger Woods fan. And to be square, this goes back with me long before the the Thanksgiving Thumping of last year. My feelings for Tiger had everything to do with his demeanor on the golf course. And his sometimes arrogant, cussing, club throwing ungracious behavior when things weren't going well on national TV. Friday though, he said all the words that he needed to, had to, and should have said. He also made statements that virtually everyone else in his position before him didn't say. He took responsibility, and that's a good thing. And I haven't lost sight of the fact that he has and does introduce the game to many kids who might not normally get to enjoy golf.
Millions of people are enthralled with this story, his fall from grace, blah blah blah....and it continues to confound me. Everyone seems so concerned for a guy that really has nothing on the line. ( I know that sounds funny, but there's a certain truth to it.) The ONLY thing I feel is really on the line are his children - too young to get or deserve any of this stuff. They will get older, and I hope grow up in a loving environment and are happy, playful, wonderful kids surrounded by countless people who love them endlessly.
As for the rest of the players here... there really is nothing on the line. Not like you, me, and our families. We're trying to pay bills, send our kids to college, and save for a retirement we hope will someday come in our golden years. For the Woods' clan, the pressures off. Tiger is 34, and Elin is a big girl too; she'll land on her feet no matter what. And I have a sneaking suspicion that the immediate families can safely plan for their golden years more easily than you and me.
Best case scenario for Tiger. - He returns successfully to the PGA tour and plays well. He lives in Florida with numerous houses, boats, cars, and raises his children in a lavish household. All of his sponsors and maybe some new ones return, and he makes another literal billion dollars. If he breaks all the PGA records, we'll forget this mess. He cleans up his act as a role model and treats us with respect as we watch him on TV. If he and Elin work it out, he'll spend every night with a Swedish model, along with a billion - plus dollars.
Worst case scenario for Tiger - He's never quite the same on the golf course again, so he makes his living as a good player, going to work every day to the greatest golf courses in the world. He still goes home to his Florida mansions, and boats, and cars. He gets a sponsor or two back. He's somewhat less foul-mouthed on TV during tournaments, but still gets the "pass" from TV announcers. Tiger still has his kids, and loves them as much as ever. He and Elin do not work it out. So Tiger has to spend every night with a new model, and somehow scrape by on a half of a billion dollars.
And that's the worst scenario! I would beg to say there's far more on the line at your house every single minute of every day than one second of Tiger Woods' life. He's famous, he's talented, he's in the public eye, and he's been uncontrollably compensated for it. Most of it NOT from the actual golf course. Most of it becuase of his really good image! Whether that's right or wrong, or if we all like it or not, that's the country we live in.
Thing is, nothing is really going to happen to Tiger. It's simply going to play itself out. And none too soon. Hopefully, Tiger will dig deep and come to the realization that the only thing on the line or in the balance are his kids.
It's simply not only about him anymore.
First off, I am not a Tiger Woods fan. And to be square, this goes back with me long before the the Thanksgiving Thumping of last year. My feelings for Tiger had everything to do with his demeanor on the golf course. And his sometimes arrogant, cussing, club throwing ungracious behavior when things weren't going well on national TV. Friday though, he said all the words that he needed to, had to, and should have said. He also made statements that virtually everyone else in his position before him didn't say. He took responsibility, and that's a good thing. And I haven't lost sight of the fact that he has and does introduce the game to many kids who might not normally get to enjoy golf.
Millions of people are enthralled with this story, his fall from grace, blah blah blah....and it continues to confound me. Everyone seems so concerned for a guy that really has nothing on the line. ( I know that sounds funny, but there's a certain truth to it.) The ONLY thing I feel is really on the line are his children - too young to get or deserve any of this stuff. They will get older, and I hope grow up in a loving environment and are happy, playful, wonderful kids surrounded by countless people who love them endlessly.
As for the rest of the players here... there really is nothing on the line. Not like you, me, and our families. We're trying to pay bills, send our kids to college, and save for a retirement we hope will someday come in our golden years. For the Woods' clan, the pressures off. Tiger is 34, and Elin is a big girl too; she'll land on her feet no matter what. And I have a sneaking suspicion that the immediate families can safely plan for their golden years more easily than you and me.
Best case scenario for Tiger. - He returns successfully to the PGA tour and plays well. He lives in Florida with numerous houses, boats, cars, and raises his children in a lavish household. All of his sponsors and maybe some new ones return, and he makes another literal billion dollars. If he breaks all the PGA records, we'll forget this mess. He cleans up his act as a role model and treats us with respect as we watch him on TV. If he and Elin work it out, he'll spend every night with a Swedish model, along with a billion - plus dollars.
Worst case scenario for Tiger - He's never quite the same on the golf course again, so he makes his living as a good player, going to work every day to the greatest golf courses in the world. He still goes home to his Florida mansions, and boats, and cars. He gets a sponsor or two back. He's somewhat less foul-mouthed on TV during tournaments, but still gets the "pass" from TV announcers. Tiger still has his kids, and loves them as much as ever. He and Elin do not work it out. So Tiger has to spend every night with a new model, and somehow scrape by on a half of a billion dollars.
And that's the worst scenario! I would beg to say there's far more on the line at your house every single minute of every day than one second of Tiger Woods' life. He's famous, he's talented, he's in the public eye, and he's been uncontrollably compensated for it. Most of it NOT from the actual golf course. Most of it becuase of his really good image! Whether that's right or wrong, or if we all like it or not, that's the country we live in.
Thing is, nothing is really going to happen to Tiger. It's simply going to play itself out. And none too soon. Hopefully, Tiger will dig deep and come to the realization that the only thing on the line or in the balance are his kids.
It's simply not only about him anymore.
Friday, February 19, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - Shutter Island
Lots of hype about the new Shutter Island, new at the box office this weekend. You've got a big time director in Martin Scorsese and a big star in Leonardo DiCaprio, you would think you have a formula for a big movie. But you don't.
This two hour and twenty minute "thriller", has been promoted in theaters and on TV for months. They have been waiting till the right time to put it in the houses. And they chose February. No competition. That's a good thing.
This is the story of a fictional insane asylum in 1954, eleven miles out in Boston Harbor. It's for the worst of the worst mental cases. There has been a disappearance of one of it's inmates, and the U.S. Marshall's are called in to investigate. Upon their arrival, there is suspicion that things aren't right there. It smacks of cover-ups private agendas. What is really going on there, who are these people and why is the U.S. Government funding such a strange and suspicious place?
I think that Shutter Island is supposed to be scary, and thrilling. But it's not. I think it's supposed to be really smart but it's not. And I think we're supposed to be in awe of this kind of movie making, where a big time director takes on a new kind of project, but we're not. It isn't that Shutter Island is a bad movie, it's just a movie. Average at best. A story that thinks it's smarter than it really is, all the while being overdone and predictable. Oh, and did I mention, slooooow and draaaagyyy at times?
Dicaprio is badly miscast, as he still looks 18, where his character is the better part of 35. Ben Kingsley is always great and is here as well as the asylums head doctor. Also nice small performances by Max von Sydow, Jackie Earle Haley, and the movies show stealer, Patricia Clarkson as a banished doctor in one simple scene is tremendous. These three prop up Shutter Island, but can't save it. Shutter Island has too many flaws.
Shutter Island. Too long, and just flat out too average. Not a lost night, just a long night.
This two hour and twenty minute "thriller", has been promoted in theaters and on TV for months. They have been waiting till the right time to put it in the houses. And they chose February. No competition. That's a good thing.
This is the story of a fictional insane asylum in 1954, eleven miles out in Boston Harbor. It's for the worst of the worst mental cases. There has been a disappearance of one of it's inmates, and the U.S. Marshall's are called in to investigate. Upon their arrival, there is suspicion that things aren't right there. It smacks of cover-ups private agendas. What is really going on there, who are these people and why is the U.S. Government funding such a strange and suspicious place?
I think that Shutter Island is supposed to be scary, and thrilling. But it's not. I think it's supposed to be really smart but it's not. And I think we're supposed to be in awe of this kind of movie making, where a big time director takes on a new kind of project, but we're not. It isn't that Shutter Island is a bad movie, it's just a movie. Average at best. A story that thinks it's smarter than it really is, all the while being overdone and predictable. Oh, and did I mention, slooooow and draaaagyyy at times?
Dicaprio is badly miscast, as he still looks 18, where his character is the better part of 35. Ben Kingsley is always great and is here as well as the asylums head doctor. Also nice small performances by Max von Sydow, Jackie Earle Haley, and the movies show stealer, Patricia Clarkson as a banished doctor in one simple scene is tremendous. These three prop up Shutter Island, but can't save it. Shutter Island has too many flaws.
Shutter Island. Too long, and just flat out too average. Not a lost night, just a long night.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
The Trouble Is Behind You
It's just a bit of bad luck that about 10 years ago, I started having some recurring back troubles. The first time I hurt myself was Thanksgiving Eve 1999 playing golf with my friend Ray in Florida. I was in bad pain for a week or so. But it passed, and I didn't miss any work. Now I see a chiropractor a few times a year and it's basically under control. I still have troubles occasionally, but not like before.
I work with some people with back issues and I'm sure you do too. This week my partner Sue Wilson, after a hearty round of snow shoveling, has her first sore back and shoulder, and she says it's been a real learning experience. Sue says, "It's always good to walk in another's shoes to learn their plight." And I love that attitude. Very healthy. And it makes those of us that wrestle with this from time to time feel more understood. Always a good thing.
A sore back can make me a bit salty. But her healthy attitude is something I am trying to adopt about this. You have to keep a sense of humor and perspective on this thing. When you have a troublesome back, it's amazing how it effects everything you do. Sue learned this Monday, when stooping down to put a simple door stop in to hold a studio door open. "Help! I need a little help here to get back up!" We all kind of smiled and giggled over her learning the ropes (she did too)...and we got her straightened back up. And truth be told, I learned too. To be a little less salty about this bad back stuff. So here goes!
Here's a list. See if you've been there.
1/ It's amazing how many things you drop when your back is sore. You drop your toothbrush
once a year. Guess when? "Do you mean I have to go ALL the way down there to get that
thing?...and back up?" The more sore the back the more things you drop.
2/ Try putting on socks when you have a sore back. It's flabbergasting how far away your
feet really are. I've actually pumped my fist and said, "YES" a few times after threading
my foot into a sock. Small victory - but when you're sore...every little bit counts.
3/ For some reason too, my shoes come untied about 500 times a day only when my back is
out. Never when I'm feeling good. I have actually had to ask people to tie my shoes before.
Rare...but I've had to. Good way to find out who really cares about you.
4/ Putting on pants. Have you ever had to "toss" your pant leg out there to get it over your
foot. It can be like a carnival game, and just as tough. The prize? Your pants are on.
Woo hoo!! (Still have the other leg though)
5/ I never knew the bathtub wall was 25 feet high. Might as well be, sometimes getting in the
shower can be like a convict scaling the wall during a prison break! (BTW, it's 16 inches)
6/ You need assistance rolling over in bed. Embarrassing. Sheesh! Enough said.
7/ After you're comfy, on the couch, and home alone, you find out you don't have the phone or
the remote with you...it's across the room.
8/ Sometimes when watching TV you have to budget extra time to actually get off the couch
and to your feet.
But these are just some of the issues that can give you fits when your back is troublesome, and in the end, it passes. In no time you're back to the spry self you are used to.
Sometimes it is tough though to put the this trouble behind you, because....the trouble is....behind you!
I work with some people with back issues and I'm sure you do too. This week my partner Sue Wilson, after a hearty round of snow shoveling, has her first sore back and shoulder, and she says it's been a real learning experience. Sue says, "It's always good to walk in another's shoes to learn their plight." And I love that attitude. Very healthy. And it makes those of us that wrestle with this from time to time feel more understood. Always a good thing.
A sore back can make me a bit salty. But her healthy attitude is something I am trying to adopt about this. You have to keep a sense of humor and perspective on this thing. When you have a troublesome back, it's amazing how it effects everything you do. Sue learned this Monday, when stooping down to put a simple door stop in to hold a studio door open. "Help! I need a little help here to get back up!" We all kind of smiled and giggled over her learning the ropes (she did too)...and we got her straightened back up. And truth be told, I learned too. To be a little less salty about this bad back stuff. So here goes!
Here's a list. See if you've been there.
1/ It's amazing how many things you drop when your back is sore. You drop your toothbrush
once a year. Guess when? "Do you mean I have to go ALL the way down there to get that
thing?...and back up?" The more sore the back the more things you drop.
2/ Try putting on socks when you have a sore back. It's flabbergasting how far away your
feet really are. I've actually pumped my fist and said, "YES" a few times after threading
my foot into a sock. Small victory - but when you're sore...every little bit counts.
3/ For some reason too, my shoes come untied about 500 times a day only when my back is
out. Never when I'm feeling good. I have actually had to ask people to tie my shoes before.
Rare...but I've had to. Good way to find out who really cares about you.
4/ Putting on pants. Have you ever had to "toss" your pant leg out there to get it over your
foot. It can be like a carnival game, and just as tough. The prize? Your pants are on.
Woo hoo!! (Still have the other leg though)
5/ I never knew the bathtub wall was 25 feet high. Might as well be, sometimes getting in the
shower can be like a convict scaling the wall during a prison break! (BTW, it's 16 inches)
6/ You need assistance rolling over in bed. Embarrassing. Sheesh! Enough said.
7/ After you're comfy, on the couch, and home alone, you find out you don't have the phone or
the remote with you...it's across the room.
8/ Sometimes when watching TV you have to budget extra time to actually get off the couch
and to your feet.
But these are just some of the issues that can give you fits when your back is troublesome, and in the end, it passes. In no time you're back to the spry self you are used to.
Sometimes it is tough though to put the this trouble behind you, because....the trouble is....behind you!
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Movies Of The Month - January
This is the first of a new feature I'll post every month right here. At beginning or so of each month, we'll feature the best and worst movie of the month. Movies must be released to our area in the month, even if the review is originally posted a day or two later. In case you missed some a the box office, we'll help guide you to, or from some of the current movies.
January - BEST movie of the month.
Crazy Heart- January 28. Jeff Bridges, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and Robert Duvall. If you are a
real movie fan, you will love this movie. Jeff Bridges is going to be real tough to
beat at the Oscars this year. He plays a down and out 57 year old outlaw country
singer well past his prime. He's an alcoholic and really practices self destructive
behavior. But he is fortunate to have people in his life that still care for him. His
gift? He can still sing and still write amazing songs. The original music written
for this movie from T Bone Burnett is amazing, and Bridges sings it wonderfully.
This movie needs not to get lost amongst the hyped up movies. Crazy Heart is
crazy good!
Honorable Mention Good -
The Book Of Eli - January 14. Denzel Washington, Gary Oldman and Mila Kunis.
Washington is always mandatory viewing. New ground for him
in this futuristic look at post nuclear war America. Tough at times, but solid.
January - WORST movie of the month
When In Rome - January 28. Kristen Bell. One of the worst attempted romantic comedies
I've seen in years. Almost unwatchable at times. Not funny, not romantic, not
anything good at all. Horribly miscast, and terribly misguided. Money used to
make this junk, should have been donated to a worthy charity somewhere, because
it was completely flushed down the john here. Thought seriously about walking
out.
Dishonorable Mention Bad -
Youth In Revolt - January 8. Micheal Cera in another terribly written supposed comedy.
No Nick And Nora's Infinite Playlist magic here. Don't even bother renting
this mistake in 90 days.
You can check out all my movie reviews for this year and last by searching though our archives
at wynnandwilson.com Or e-mail me your thoughts and comments to scott@wqmx.com
January - BEST movie of the month.
Crazy Heart- January 28. Jeff Bridges, Maggie Gyllenhaal, and Robert Duvall. If you are a
real movie fan, you will love this movie. Jeff Bridges is going to be real tough to
beat at the Oscars this year. He plays a down and out 57 year old outlaw country
singer well past his prime. He's an alcoholic and really practices self destructive
behavior. But he is fortunate to have people in his life that still care for him. His
gift? He can still sing and still write amazing songs. The original music written
for this movie from T Bone Burnett is amazing, and Bridges sings it wonderfully.
This movie needs not to get lost amongst the hyped up movies. Crazy Heart is
crazy good!
Honorable Mention Good -
The Book Of Eli - January 14. Denzel Washington, Gary Oldman and Mila Kunis.
Washington is always mandatory viewing. New ground for him
in this futuristic look at post nuclear war America. Tough at times, but solid.
January - WORST movie of the month
When In Rome - January 28. Kristen Bell. One of the worst attempted romantic comedies
I've seen in years. Almost unwatchable at times. Not funny, not romantic, not
anything good at all. Horribly miscast, and terribly misguided. Money used to
make this junk, should have been donated to a worthy charity somewhere, because
it was completely flushed down the john here. Thought seriously about walking
out.
Dishonorable Mention Bad -
Youth In Revolt - January 8. Micheal Cera in another terribly written supposed comedy.
No Nick And Nora's Infinite Playlist magic here. Don't even bother renting
this mistake in 90 days.
You can check out all my movie reviews for this year and last by searching though our archives
at wynnandwilson.com Or e-mail me your thoughts and comments to scott@wqmx.com
MOVIE REVIEW - Valentines Day
This years Hollywood installment of the "Battle Of The Mid-Level Stars" movie is, Valentines Day. You may remember last winter, He's Just Not That Into You, was in theaters, and this year it's new stars...same formula.
Hollywood is trying to get you to come to the movies this February by packing as many new faces and some established faces into one 2 hour movie in hopes you'll think this is something real special. But remember, just because you know who all these people are doesn't mean this is going to be good.
Valentines Day, is the day in the life of a bunch of young people from Los Angeles, that just happens to be Valentines Day. Some of these stories are semi connected, but others are not. All have love troubles on the most romantic of days. There really is no main story here, much like last years He's Just No that Into You. So there really is not plot to follow. But as all of the action shakes out, Valentines Day essentially stars Ashton Kutcher and Jennifer Garner. They emerge as the movies main characters, and both are OK as their story seems to get the most screen time.
The real trouble here is the look of this movie. What it really looks like is that all of these stars stopped by for a day or two to shoot their part and leave. There are stars in the previews you will see on screen for about 5 minutes total, namely Bradley Cooper. Jessica Alba and Julia Roberts. I'm just sayin'. If you're thinking this is a Julia Roberts flick...think again. Valentines Day is paced well enough, but it just looks so separated, and disjointed.
There are some laughs though, Anne Hathaway can be very funny, and is here. And the surprising Taylor Swift was a "valley high school girl" is very funny in her really tiny role. The strength that Valentines Day can fall back on, is it's pacing and it's really great soundtrack, as it pulls many artists and genres together and really adds to the ambiance of the film. But even with a positive or two , it can't really be saved.
Valentines Day though will be very appealing to it's young audience who will delight in seeing many of their favorites gathered in one film, and that's OK. In all honesty, this is not real serious film making and sometimes that's OK too. Sometimes we need simply an escape to go to and just watch a mindless story play out in front of us for a couple hours. And that is Valentines Day.
Valentines Day. Good movie? No. Good for just some simple fun? Yes.
Hollywood is trying to get you to come to the movies this February by packing as many new faces and some established faces into one 2 hour movie in hopes you'll think this is something real special. But remember, just because you know who all these people are doesn't mean this is going to be good.
Valentines Day, is the day in the life of a bunch of young people from Los Angeles, that just happens to be Valentines Day. Some of these stories are semi connected, but others are not. All have love troubles on the most romantic of days. There really is no main story here, much like last years He's Just No that Into You. So there really is not plot to follow. But as all of the action shakes out, Valentines Day essentially stars Ashton Kutcher and Jennifer Garner. They emerge as the movies main characters, and both are OK as their story seems to get the most screen time.
The real trouble here is the look of this movie. What it really looks like is that all of these stars stopped by for a day or two to shoot their part and leave. There are stars in the previews you will see on screen for about 5 minutes total, namely Bradley Cooper. Jessica Alba and Julia Roberts. I'm just sayin'. If you're thinking this is a Julia Roberts flick...think again. Valentines Day is paced well enough, but it just looks so separated, and disjointed.
There are some laughs though, Anne Hathaway can be very funny, and is here. And the surprising Taylor Swift was a "valley high school girl" is very funny in her really tiny role. The strength that Valentines Day can fall back on, is it's pacing and it's really great soundtrack, as it pulls many artists and genres together and really adds to the ambiance of the film. But even with a positive or two , it can't really be saved.
Valentines Day though will be very appealing to it's young audience who will delight in seeing many of their favorites gathered in one film, and that's OK. In all honesty, this is not real serious film making and sometimes that's OK too. Sometimes we need simply an escape to go to and just watch a mindless story play out in front of us for a couple hours. And that is Valentines Day.
Valentines Day. Good movie? No. Good for just some simple fun? Yes.
Friday, February 12, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - The Wolfman
Academy award winner Benicio Tel Toro and Anthony Hopkins star in yet another movie along the legend line, The Wolfman.
It's England 1891, and there big trouble here. Suddenly on the full moon, men are being shredded by something, that no one can figure out. It's not an animal, or a human, but it is thought to be something of legend and lore. All fingers seem to point to a "cursed family," and their grown son Lawrence (Del Toro). His father (Hopkins) too is a rather distant, strange man that has also drawn suspicion. But no one really knows what they're dealing with. But we do. It's a werewolf. But who is it? And what can be done to stop the carnage?
The Wolfman is a very interesting movie to say the least. At the outset, it looks like it's really going to be a stellar movie of it's kind. You know that there's going to be blood and death, but you're hoping there is more to go with it. First the sets, costuming, makeup,music, and cinematography are absolutely wonderful. They do a great job of taking you back to England. You can feel the chill, and the dark, dank mist that was England in the late 19th century. You are fantastically transported to an era gone by. All of that in it's favor.
But little by little it starts to erode itself. There are numerous slow and draggy scenes that seem to say nothing, with awkward dialogue. Then comes the big payoff, of which I have never seen. With all this wonderful build-up, when the Wolfman finally makes the scene, I hate to say, looks a bit silly, fake and phony. The startling metamorphosis from man to beast is fine, but the 'wolf" is silly, and hard to see at times. And I have to say the silly masks that are worn will looking more like 1960's than 2010. It's so strange. Usually these movie are in reverse. All the effort going into the "beast" and little into the rest. Here it's just the opposite.
But if it's blood gore and guts you want, there is plenty of shredding, eating and decapitating to go around. It's a shame this movie couldn't finish the deal it started. And it's not as smart as it looks either. You will find yourself way ahead of the story. Predictable, with inevitable scenes you know are coming. With a good leading cast, and a wonderful set up, with all of it's ducks seemingly in a row, in the end it really comes up short.
The Wolfman. Great window dressing. Too bad you don't buy what's on sale.
It's England 1891, and there big trouble here. Suddenly on the full moon, men are being shredded by something, that no one can figure out. It's not an animal, or a human, but it is thought to be something of legend and lore. All fingers seem to point to a "cursed family," and their grown son Lawrence (Del Toro). His father (Hopkins) too is a rather distant, strange man that has also drawn suspicion. But no one really knows what they're dealing with. But we do. It's a werewolf. But who is it? And what can be done to stop the carnage?
The Wolfman is a very interesting movie to say the least. At the outset, it looks like it's really going to be a stellar movie of it's kind. You know that there's going to be blood and death, but you're hoping there is more to go with it. First the sets, costuming, makeup,music, and cinematography are absolutely wonderful. They do a great job of taking you back to England. You can feel the chill, and the dark, dank mist that was England in the late 19th century. You are fantastically transported to an era gone by. All of that in it's favor.
But little by little it starts to erode itself. There are numerous slow and draggy scenes that seem to say nothing, with awkward dialogue. Then comes the big payoff, of which I have never seen. With all this wonderful build-up, when the Wolfman finally makes the scene, I hate to say, looks a bit silly, fake and phony. The startling metamorphosis from man to beast is fine, but the 'wolf" is silly, and hard to see at times. And I have to say the silly masks that are worn will looking more like 1960's than 2010. It's so strange. Usually these movie are in reverse. All the effort going into the "beast" and little into the rest. Here it's just the opposite.
But if it's blood gore and guts you want, there is plenty of shredding, eating and decapitating to go around. It's a shame this movie couldn't finish the deal it started. And it's not as smart as it looks either. You will find yourself way ahead of the story. Predictable, with inevitable scenes you know are coming. With a good leading cast, and a wonderful set up, with all of it's ducks seemingly in a row, in the end it really comes up short.
The Wolfman. Great window dressing. Too bad you don't buy what's on sale.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Maybe A Movie This Valentines Day?
Valentines Day is here - already. Are you ready? Whether you are or not it's time to think about some Valentines plans. Maybe a movie? Either on the big screen, rental or on demand on your home TV. Here are a few ways you can go, to help put some fun in your Valentines Day plans. First though, I would still recommend a flower or two and maybe dinner and a card.
If you're heading out to the movie theaters here we go! Out now!
1/ Valentines Day - (Out Friday) Virtually every young star in Hollywood in this movie. A
look at modern day Valentines Day. Big soundtrack too.
2/ Dear John - Nicolas Sparks latest love story novel comes to the movies. Huge in its first
weekend. Guys, you will score major points if you initiate the idea of going to this
movie.
3/ When In Rome - Well it's bad. But it's out there. I guess you could use this as a backup plan
if the above two are sold out!
4/ It's Complicated - It's still out there. Good recommendation for a little older audience.
Maybe you're going to stay home and rent or go all on demand on us. Well, here are a few of my favorite romantic comedy classics. Some you may know or have seen, and some maybe not. All good for a fun, romantic time. In no particular order.
1/ Sleepless In Seattle - Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan. A wonderful story, and fun performances
Still holds up nicely if it's been a while since you've seen it.
2/ While You Were Sleeping - Sandra Bullock. An early Bullock movie. And except for The Blind
Side, I think her best performance in her career. Just flat out fun!
3/ When Harry Met Sally - Changed everything about romantic comedies. Billy Crystal and
Meg Ryan again. Funny, and fun!
4/ Return To Me - Here's a sleeper. David Duchovney and Minnie Driver. A sad start gives
way to a real feel good finish. This movie should have better success. You have to stick
with it
5/ The Proposal - A surprisingly good Sandra Bullock flick, early last year. If you missed it, it's
great fun. A real surprise!
If you're a bit more daring and really want a classic to rent, then let's go back a bit further.
1/ Some Like It Hot - Tony Curtis, Jack Lemmon and Marilyn Monroe. A classic. And did I
mention Marilyn Monroe? A fun 90 minutes.
2/ How to Marry A Millionaire - Laren Bacall, Marilyn Monroe and Betty Grable. Funny little
story. Looks dated, but it's fun.
3/ Any Doris Day/Rock Hudson romantic comedy - There's a bunch of them and they are all
fun!
To avoid! These are flicks to avoid if romance is what you're looking for! For some reason these will not work for Valentines Day!
1/ Up In The Air - This is a GREAT movie. BUT, even though they packaged this as a romantic
comedy, but it is NOT! This is way more drama than you may be looking for.
2/ Love Happens - Jennifer Anniston and Aaron Eckhart. This is way too heavy too for a light
Valentines Day night!
Well there you go. Some do's and don'ts. And I know there are tons more out there, but these are some worth looking into - or not!
Happy Valentines Day!
If you're heading out to the movie theaters here we go! Out now!
1/ Valentines Day - (Out Friday) Virtually every young star in Hollywood in this movie. A
look at modern day Valentines Day. Big soundtrack too.
2/ Dear John - Nicolas Sparks latest love story novel comes to the movies. Huge in its first
weekend. Guys, you will score major points if you initiate the idea of going to this
movie.
3/ When In Rome - Well it's bad. But it's out there. I guess you could use this as a backup plan
if the above two are sold out!
4/ It's Complicated - It's still out there. Good recommendation for a little older audience.
Maybe you're going to stay home and rent or go all on demand on us. Well, here are a few of my favorite romantic comedy classics. Some you may know or have seen, and some maybe not. All good for a fun, romantic time. In no particular order.
1/ Sleepless In Seattle - Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan. A wonderful story, and fun performances
Still holds up nicely if it's been a while since you've seen it.
2/ While You Were Sleeping - Sandra Bullock. An early Bullock movie. And except for The Blind
Side, I think her best performance in her career. Just flat out fun!
3/ When Harry Met Sally - Changed everything about romantic comedies. Billy Crystal and
Meg Ryan again. Funny, and fun!
4/ Return To Me - Here's a sleeper. David Duchovney and Minnie Driver. A sad start gives
way to a real feel good finish. This movie should have better success. You have to stick
with it
5/ The Proposal - A surprisingly good Sandra Bullock flick, early last year. If you missed it, it's
great fun. A real surprise!
If you're a bit more daring and really want a classic to rent, then let's go back a bit further.
1/ Some Like It Hot - Tony Curtis, Jack Lemmon and Marilyn Monroe. A classic. And did I
mention Marilyn Monroe? A fun 90 minutes.
2/ How to Marry A Millionaire - Laren Bacall, Marilyn Monroe and Betty Grable. Funny little
story. Looks dated, but it's fun.
3/ Any Doris Day/Rock Hudson romantic comedy - There's a bunch of them and they are all
fun!
To avoid! These are flicks to avoid if romance is what you're looking for! For some reason these will not work for Valentines Day!
1/ Up In The Air - This is a GREAT movie. BUT, even though they packaged this as a romantic
comedy, but it is NOT! This is way more drama than you may be looking for.
2/ Love Happens - Jennifer Anniston and Aaron Eckhart. This is way too heavy too for a light
Valentines Day night!
Well there you go. Some do's and don'ts. And I know there are tons more out there, but these are some worth looking into - or not!
Happy Valentines Day!
Sunday, February 7, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - Dear John
Nicolas Sparks books that come to the movies are among the toughest to review. Dear John is the latest Sparks book at the movies this week.
Channing Tatum and Amanda Seyfried star in this young love story that takes place in the early 2000's Tatum stars as John. He is an army special forces soldier that is home on leave at the beach. There he meets Savannah (Seyfried) who is on Spring Break from college. He of course is a good guy bound by honor, family and duty. She is a great young kid in every regard. They meet and fall in love in two short weeks. Then John has to go back to duty.
The two exchange letters daily in the year they are apart, all the while keeping the faith in each other and their young relationship. Then September 11, 2001 happens. And John bound by honor re-ups in the army, after his tour is up. A new two year commitment is upon them. Can they survive the time apart? Is it all too much? Will there be someone else for Savannah in Johns absence? Will John survive his tour of duty in the Middle East? This is Dear John.
The tough thing about Sparks stories I feel is that they make far better books than movies. They read well, and easy. Dear John isn't a bad movie, but it's a Sparks movie. They all have the same feel. The characters that come to the screen are all somewhat the same, and the formula works. These movies by and large are huge hits. Most of these stories are about good people with big problems and can't quite seem to get love right. And that's Dear John
Truth be told, the audience seemed to love this movie. Full house, clapping at the end, sobbing throughout. All signs that Dear John is touching the ones it's supposed to. In a movie sense, Dear John is not the most exciting Sparks movie ever. There were scenes that seemed to drag on from time to time, where no one was really saying much. Lots of letter reading too. And even though this is over in a tidy 95 minutes, at times it seemed long. But not a deal breaker here.
The core audience who will pay time and time again to see Dear John won't care about one thing that's maybe out of place here. These movies don't win awards, or really get very good critical acclaim. But they know their fans, and cater to them wonderfully. This is a topical story for our times, that speaks directly to many people affected by the current climate involving young people in our world today. And for that, it should be applauded. This Sparks story has a reason to be told, and to me that's a separator from some of his other works. I did find myself caring a bit more for these characters than the typical Sparks characters.
Dear John. It is what is is. It's a Sparks story on the screen. Destined for big success. Maybe not by critics, but sometimes by someone more important.....it's audience.
Channing Tatum and Amanda Seyfried star in this young love story that takes place in the early 2000's Tatum stars as John. He is an army special forces soldier that is home on leave at the beach. There he meets Savannah (Seyfried) who is on Spring Break from college. He of course is a good guy bound by honor, family and duty. She is a great young kid in every regard. They meet and fall in love in two short weeks. Then John has to go back to duty.
The two exchange letters daily in the year they are apart, all the while keeping the faith in each other and their young relationship. Then September 11, 2001 happens. And John bound by honor re-ups in the army, after his tour is up. A new two year commitment is upon them. Can they survive the time apart? Is it all too much? Will there be someone else for Savannah in Johns absence? Will John survive his tour of duty in the Middle East? This is Dear John.
The tough thing about Sparks stories I feel is that they make far better books than movies. They read well, and easy. Dear John isn't a bad movie, but it's a Sparks movie. They all have the same feel. The characters that come to the screen are all somewhat the same, and the formula works. These movies by and large are huge hits. Most of these stories are about good people with big problems and can't quite seem to get love right. And that's Dear John
Truth be told, the audience seemed to love this movie. Full house, clapping at the end, sobbing throughout. All signs that Dear John is touching the ones it's supposed to. In a movie sense, Dear John is not the most exciting Sparks movie ever. There were scenes that seemed to drag on from time to time, where no one was really saying much. Lots of letter reading too. And even though this is over in a tidy 95 minutes, at times it seemed long. But not a deal breaker here.
The core audience who will pay time and time again to see Dear John won't care about one thing that's maybe out of place here. These movies don't win awards, or really get very good critical acclaim. But they know their fans, and cater to them wonderfully. This is a topical story for our times, that speaks directly to many people affected by the current climate involving young people in our world today. And for that, it should be applauded. This Sparks story has a reason to be told, and to me that's a separator from some of his other works. I did find myself caring a bit more for these characters than the typical Sparks characters.
Dear John. It is what is is. It's a Sparks story on the screen. Destined for big success. Maybe not by critics, but sometimes by someone more important.....it's audience.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - From Paris With Love
John Travolta is back on the big screen with the new action movie, From Paris With Love. Also starring Jonathan Rhys Meyers, and a bunch of action.
FPWL is the story of a young government intelligence agent James (Meyers) living in Paris with his beautiful French fiance'. James wants more from his career and wants to be more part of the "action." So as luck would have it, he gets teamed up with Charlie Wax (Travolta). Wax is the governments best counter-terrorism agent. Wax has a very unorthodox way of handling virtually every situation. He just kills everyone in his path. The two of them storm through Paris and basically killing everyone in their way. Well, at least Wax does.
This is the problem here. FPWL is about 90 minutes and after about 50 of those, someone behind the scenes said, "Hey maybe we should have a story here!" Good idea. Then a few twists take place that actually give FPWL a direction. For the first half of this movie, it's basically James watching Wax play superhero. Or even worse, it's more Meyers watching Travolta play "movie." Half of a movie of gratuitous killing with no story doesn't really work.
After a story starts to take shape FPWL, does get a whole lot better in a hurry. And to be honest if you're in the mood for mindless action, then this may be your movie. There is a certain sense too of this movie not taking itself too seriously, and that helps. Some funny lines, and an attempt at developing Wax as a real "character" sort of works, but the trouble here, all Wax really does is kill people. So the character definition comes up a bit short.
To be fair, this is not a washout. But in honesty, it's a movie that you've seen a thousand times before, just not with Travolta with a bald head. It's forgettable, and in the course of time, will just be a movie you confuse with other movies just like it. It's only 90 minutes so it doesn't wear out its welcome either.
From Paris With Love. Mindless action, generally leads to a mindless movie. Nothing new here.
FPWL is the story of a young government intelligence agent James (Meyers) living in Paris with his beautiful French fiance'. James wants more from his career and wants to be more part of the "action." So as luck would have it, he gets teamed up with Charlie Wax (Travolta). Wax is the governments best counter-terrorism agent. Wax has a very unorthodox way of handling virtually every situation. He just kills everyone in his path. The two of them storm through Paris and basically killing everyone in their way. Well, at least Wax does.
This is the problem here. FPWL is about 90 minutes and after about 50 of those, someone behind the scenes said, "Hey maybe we should have a story here!" Good idea. Then a few twists take place that actually give FPWL a direction. For the first half of this movie, it's basically James watching Wax play superhero. Or even worse, it's more Meyers watching Travolta play "movie." Half of a movie of gratuitous killing with no story doesn't really work.
After a story starts to take shape FPWL, does get a whole lot better in a hurry. And to be honest if you're in the mood for mindless action, then this may be your movie. There is a certain sense too of this movie not taking itself too seriously, and that helps. Some funny lines, and an attempt at developing Wax as a real "character" sort of works, but the trouble here, all Wax really does is kill people. So the character definition comes up a bit short.
To be fair, this is not a washout. But in honesty, it's a movie that you've seen a thousand times before, just not with Travolta with a bald head. It's forgettable, and in the course of time, will just be a movie you confuse with other movies just like it. It's only 90 minutes so it doesn't wear out its welcome either.
From Paris With Love. Mindless action, generally leads to a mindless movie. Nothing new here.
It's Still February!
I've thought about it from virtually every angle before sitting down to write this piece, and I keep coming to the same conclusion. February just isn't any good.
I don't like it anymore than you do. Dissing an entire month simply because it exists. But after careful review, February just doesn't have any real redeeming qualities, sad to say. February is the monthly equivalent to, "no mans land." It's the abyss of months. There are those over the years have tried to prop February up and give it some feel, but they too have failed miserably.
Think about all that's been done to February over the years. First they lopped off two days at then end to shorten it down get the whole mess over with, and flip over to March. (And by the way, I've got a bone or two with March, the whole lion/lamb thing, but that's another day.) This "lopping off" in theory is a good idea, but in the end - ho hum. Then came the installation of Ground Hog's Day. Ah yes. There's just something about watching a bunch of drunken idiots in stove pipe hats in Pennsylvania playing around with a rodent at 7am on national TV that I look forward to every year. It really starts the month off with a bang, to know this rodent always says 6 more weeks of winter.
Two weeks later comes Valentines Day. Now here's a good idea. Let's take the worst month of the year and toss in a "holiday" where your love life is on display for the entire world to see. Sheesh! Then comes a Federal Holiday with Presidents Day, many get the day off. Good idea. Then there's the "pitchers and catchers report to spring training thing." So? They're in Florida and Arizona, where speaking from experience, February is too SHORT!
Then the Daytona 500, The NBA All-Star Game, and now they even play the Superbowl in February. The Oscar nominations come out, there are about 5,000 awards shows on, and still February drags on and on and on. This year, we really get the bonus, as the Olympics are on for two weeks. Question. Have you never tried to push a chain? That's February. No matter what you do, it just doesn't work.
Then as a final futile attempt at February fun, the February fans really flubbed it up, with this silly leap year/day thing. You know 28 days except on leap year, when there's 29...blah blah.....who the heck cares? It's not cute, it's not clever, it just makes it longer once every 4 years. You want better reviews? Add that silly day in June! June's got 30,... there's room, the math still works out, and it's JUNE!!! Every four years it could go right there. We'd all benefit. Get with it man! Anyone disagree?
Well that's it, I'm going out now and take the dog out on the wind swept frozen tundra that was my back yard. Maybe later I'm hoping to knock some of the stalagmite icicles off my gutter, and then maybe towards days end, I'll sit in my living room and listen to my gas meter spin and sound like a Chinook Helicopter. I've got a full day.
I am convinced that in three months....it will still be February. I don't know how that will be possible, but it will.
Or at least it may seem so.
I don't like it anymore than you do. Dissing an entire month simply because it exists. But after careful review, February just doesn't have any real redeeming qualities, sad to say. February is the monthly equivalent to, "no mans land." It's the abyss of months. There are those over the years have tried to prop February up and give it some feel, but they too have failed miserably.
Think about all that's been done to February over the years. First they lopped off two days at then end to shorten it down get the whole mess over with, and flip over to March. (And by the way, I've got a bone or two with March, the whole lion/lamb thing, but that's another day.) This "lopping off" in theory is a good idea, but in the end - ho hum. Then came the installation of Ground Hog's Day. Ah yes. There's just something about watching a bunch of drunken idiots in stove pipe hats in Pennsylvania playing around with a rodent at 7am on national TV that I look forward to every year. It really starts the month off with a bang, to know this rodent always says 6 more weeks of winter.
Two weeks later comes Valentines Day. Now here's a good idea. Let's take the worst month of the year and toss in a "holiday" where your love life is on display for the entire world to see. Sheesh! Then comes a Federal Holiday with Presidents Day, many get the day off. Good idea. Then there's the "pitchers and catchers report to spring training thing." So? They're in Florida and Arizona, where speaking from experience, February is too SHORT!
Then the Daytona 500, The NBA All-Star Game, and now they even play the Superbowl in February. The Oscar nominations come out, there are about 5,000 awards shows on, and still February drags on and on and on. This year, we really get the bonus, as the Olympics are on for two weeks. Question. Have you never tried to push a chain? That's February. No matter what you do, it just doesn't work.
Then as a final futile attempt at February fun, the February fans really flubbed it up, with this silly leap year/day thing. You know 28 days except on leap year, when there's 29...blah blah.....who the heck cares? It's not cute, it's not clever, it just makes it longer once every 4 years. You want better reviews? Add that silly day in June! June's got 30,... there's room, the math still works out, and it's JUNE!!! Every four years it could go right there. We'd all benefit. Get with it man! Anyone disagree?
Well that's it, I'm going out now and take the dog out on the wind swept frozen tundra that was my back yard. Maybe later I'm hoping to knock some of the stalagmite icicles off my gutter, and then maybe towards days end, I'll sit in my living room and listen to my gas meter spin and sound like a Chinook Helicopter. I've got a full day.
I am convinced that in three months....it will still be February. I don't know how that will be possible, but it will.
Or at least it may seem so.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - Crazy Heart
Every once in a while a movie comes out to little fanfare, high critical acclaim, and to little commercial success. That is the new Jeff Bridges flick, Crazy Heart.
Whether you are a Bridges fan or not, this is a role of a lifetime for him. It's good to see a good actor get a great role and seemingly be born to play it. When the Oscars are distributed in March, he may be tough to beat.
Crazy Heart is a fictional story of Bad Blake. He is a a 57 year- old outlaw country singer from Texas. His best days are behind him as far a success is concerned. Now he's broke, a drunk, a chain smoker, and traveling alone doing once night stand gigs, basically to support his awful habits. But one saving grace for Blake. He can still sing and is a very gifted songwriter. There are many people in his life that are still trying to help him navigate through this world, but his self-destructive behavior keeps getting in the way.
This is great story that goes deep into his character and the supporting characters and tells a story that is very honest that can, and will make you uncomfortable at times. Also, the original country music in Crazy Heart is really first class. A whole group of original songs that really are the strength of this movie along with Bridges first rate performance. Also, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Robert Duvall, and Colin Firth star, and are all terrific as the people trying hard to get Blake through.
Besides Bridges, the star of this movie is...the movie, and the story. It's a true to life story that really spells out that many times in life some things can be fixed, and others can't, or are not meant to be fixed. This is a moving story that will undoubtedly be relateable to you on some level. Also, you don't have to be big country music fan to enjoy it, but it doesn't hurt. Crazy Heart is also filmed beautifully with wonderful vantage points for us to enjoy, and give us a front row seat to this wonderful story.
Crazy Heart. A first class movie, that hopefully won't be lost at the box office. Bridges - Fantastic!
Whether you are a Bridges fan or not, this is a role of a lifetime for him. It's good to see a good actor get a great role and seemingly be born to play it. When the Oscars are distributed in March, he may be tough to beat.
Crazy Heart is a fictional story of Bad Blake. He is a a 57 year- old outlaw country singer from Texas. His best days are behind him as far a success is concerned. Now he's broke, a drunk, a chain smoker, and traveling alone doing once night stand gigs, basically to support his awful habits. But one saving grace for Blake. He can still sing and is a very gifted songwriter. There are many people in his life that are still trying to help him navigate through this world, but his self-destructive behavior keeps getting in the way.
This is great story that goes deep into his character and the supporting characters and tells a story that is very honest that can, and will make you uncomfortable at times. Also, the original country music in Crazy Heart is really first class. A whole group of original songs that really are the strength of this movie along with Bridges first rate performance. Also, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Robert Duvall, and Colin Firth star, and are all terrific as the people trying hard to get Blake through.
Besides Bridges, the star of this movie is...the movie, and the story. It's a true to life story that really spells out that many times in life some things can be fixed, and others can't, or are not meant to be fixed. This is a moving story that will undoubtedly be relateable to you on some level. Also, you don't have to be big country music fan to enjoy it, but it doesn't hurt. Crazy Heart is also filmed beautifully with wonderful vantage points for us to enjoy, and give us a front row seat to this wonderful story.
Crazy Heart. A first class movie, that hopefully won't be lost at the box office. Bridges - Fantastic!
Monday, February 1, 2010
MOVIE REVIEW - When In Rome
Holy cow, did I really make it through When In Rome? It was tough. The only movie I have ever walked out of in my life was Gone Fishin' with Danny Glover in the 1990's. But this was the biggest challenge to that streak yet watching When in Rome with the beautiful Kristin Bell.
WIR is a romantic comedy about Beth (Bell) and Nick (Josh Duhemal.) After Beth's little sister gets engaged and married in two weeks, Beth is feeling unlucky in love. The wedding is in Rome and while there, Beth meets Nick. Beth then in a drunken state, takes 5 coins out of a sacred wishing well. Roman legend says that if you take coins out of the fountain, that whoevers coin that was, they will fall in love with you. And 5 guys fall in love with her, all of which she doesn't want. She wants Nick. This is the basic premise to WIR. It doesn't get any better - sorry.
First of all, Beth has a big time job as a curator in New York City at the Guggenheim. Kristin Bell still looks like she could be cheering for the high school football team. Her sister that gets married looks 12, and for some reason her assistant at the Guggenheim seems 14. There is a ton of horrible casting decisions here. Virtually no one in a main role is anywhere near believable, excepting Dumelah. WIR reminds us of those manic comedies of years ago. Very frantic, very awkward at times, very unfunny all the time. Silliness is the rule here. There really is no story, there are no real characters of any substance or depth.
This movie just sort of plays out in front of you. All coming to the total predictable ending you know is coming in the first 5 minutes. This looks like a rejected Disney Channel feature at best and not a theater release. And I don't know if it's a bad thing or the saving grace, but this whole thing from start to a 5 minute silly video dance scene over the closing credits finish is a whopping 85 minutes.
But in it's defense, some people thought this was a good idea. Small roles with Don Johnson, Angelica Huston, and Danny DeVito somehow were talked into this thing. Toss in a couple of cameos with Shaquille O'Neal and Lawrence Taylor too. Much if it filmed in wonderful Rome, and there's a backdrop or two that is memorable. But that's it. Plus, I don't think anyone wants to see Danny DeVito lusting after Kristin Bell. Pretty creepy even to write, but low and behold, you get to see it here on screen. Oh, lovely day!
WIR is targeted at an extremely young adult audience. And understanding that all movies can't be all things to all people, there is such a thing as just bad! And When In Rome is just bad. - Period. If this was a kids movie I'd gladly let if off the hook, but it's not. This is a serious attempt at a real movie. The majority of this mess is not the actors fault. It's just a silly story, with horrible dialogue. And there are some really bad actors in some roles that are written badly. Bell is certainly lovely on screen, but the hill is too high to climb here. This stinks, and then the ship sinks.
I know it's February, and there's little to do. But buyer beware, you may leave early to go home, when going to see When In Rome.
WIR is a romantic comedy about Beth (Bell) and Nick (Josh Duhemal.) After Beth's little sister gets engaged and married in two weeks, Beth is feeling unlucky in love. The wedding is in Rome and while there, Beth meets Nick. Beth then in a drunken state, takes 5 coins out of a sacred wishing well. Roman legend says that if you take coins out of the fountain, that whoevers coin that was, they will fall in love with you. And 5 guys fall in love with her, all of which she doesn't want. She wants Nick. This is the basic premise to WIR. It doesn't get any better - sorry.
First of all, Beth has a big time job as a curator in New York City at the Guggenheim. Kristin Bell still looks like she could be cheering for the high school football team. Her sister that gets married looks 12, and for some reason her assistant at the Guggenheim seems 14. There is a ton of horrible casting decisions here. Virtually no one in a main role is anywhere near believable, excepting Dumelah. WIR reminds us of those manic comedies of years ago. Very frantic, very awkward at times, very unfunny all the time. Silliness is the rule here. There really is no story, there are no real characters of any substance or depth.
This movie just sort of plays out in front of you. All coming to the total predictable ending you know is coming in the first 5 minutes. This looks like a rejected Disney Channel feature at best and not a theater release. And I don't know if it's a bad thing or the saving grace, but this whole thing from start to a 5 minute silly video dance scene over the closing credits finish is a whopping 85 minutes.
But in it's defense, some people thought this was a good idea. Small roles with Don Johnson, Angelica Huston, and Danny DeVito somehow were talked into this thing. Toss in a couple of cameos with Shaquille O'Neal and Lawrence Taylor too. Much if it filmed in wonderful Rome, and there's a backdrop or two that is memorable. But that's it. Plus, I don't think anyone wants to see Danny DeVito lusting after Kristin Bell. Pretty creepy even to write, but low and behold, you get to see it here on screen. Oh, lovely day!
WIR is targeted at an extremely young adult audience. And understanding that all movies can't be all things to all people, there is such a thing as just bad! And When In Rome is just bad. - Period. If this was a kids movie I'd gladly let if off the hook, but it's not. This is a serious attempt at a real movie. The majority of this mess is not the actors fault. It's just a silly story, with horrible dialogue. And there are some really bad actors in some roles that are written badly. Bell is certainly lovely on screen, but the hill is too high to climb here. This stinks, and then the ship sinks.
I know it's February, and there's little to do. But buyer beware, you may leave early to go home, when going to see When In Rome.
Underdogs
Many of us, including me are perennial rooters for the underdog. At one time I think it was the rule in our society. But as time goes on, the gap between underdog rooters and front runners seems to have narrowed.
The whole underdog thing goes back to the beginning I guess. There's David and Goliath, pretty much the original. For us Americans, pulling for the underdog is part of who we are are a nation. That feeling can be traced back to the Revolutionary War. Groups of out manned, out gunned militia, eventually defeating the English Empire and becoming a nation. There are countless other examples from Hollywood to sports, to the more important and inspiring stories you know in your family or hometown.
These thoughts came to me Friday afternoon when I stumbled across the press conference where NFL quarterback Kurt Warner announced his retirement from the league after 12, what can only be called magical seasons. In this day of athletes and celebrities doing all sorts of awful things, and making horrible mis-steps, thank goodness there was Kurt Warner for us to really cheer for. And I don't mean as part of the game, I mean to cheer for in life. I'm not going to give you stats and numbers. They speak for themselves, because Warner was so much more than that.
Here's a guy that was told time and time again he wasn't something enough. Finally getting his chance as a senior at Northern Iowa University (who?). Then on to the Arena League, and eventually on to the silly NFL Europe thing. Then after all that, stocking shelves at mid-west grocery store, Hy-Vee (where there's a helpful smile...in every isle.) That's their jingle. Finally getting a call from the St. Louis Rams of the NFL, as their 3rd string QB. That ear he was thrust into the starting role as the injuries mounted. After decades of futility, the Rams won the Superbowl and he the MVP. Then another Superbowl trip another MVP and a Superbowl MVP. A few years later he raised up the Arizona Cardinals franchise (from Phoenix...ironically) and took them to the Superbowl after over 60 years of no success at all. A Superbowl that they should have won. The success in Arizona came after being run out of a city that has virtually no use for underdogs ever - New York City. - Front runners!
OK enough background. Beyond all that, and more importantly, Warner did it the right way. He rose to the top of his profession all the while being told that he wasn't this enough or that enough, or too old or his time was over. Kurt Warner is the quintessential underdog. He even wore number 13 his entire career. And he did it with class, style and made you feel good that there still are guys in this world that kids can look up to that are good for them do to so. It was all never about him it was about the team. (What a concept) He single handedly brought two NFL franchises back from the dead at break neck speed. The Rams have never been the same since he left 7 years ago, the jury is now out on the Cardinals who now have to attempt prosperity without him.
There's an aura of serendipity around Warner that all of us can envy. He is a shining example in life that good things really do happen to good people. And those who have felt that the role of underdog is too much to climb out from under, Warner's story helps put that to rest.
I'm going to miss Kurt Warner from the NFL. But at 38, time caught up with him, and it's time. It's a big loss for the NFL, and all professional sports, that needs all the good guys it can get. Because they seen to be in short supply these days.
Oh by the way, Kurt Warner is going to underdog his way to Canton in a few years to the Hall Of Fame.
The whole underdog thing goes back to the beginning I guess. There's David and Goliath, pretty much the original. For us Americans, pulling for the underdog is part of who we are are a nation. That feeling can be traced back to the Revolutionary War. Groups of out manned, out gunned militia, eventually defeating the English Empire and becoming a nation. There are countless other examples from Hollywood to sports, to the more important and inspiring stories you know in your family or hometown.
These thoughts came to me Friday afternoon when I stumbled across the press conference where NFL quarterback Kurt Warner announced his retirement from the league after 12, what can only be called magical seasons. In this day of athletes and celebrities doing all sorts of awful things, and making horrible mis-steps, thank goodness there was Kurt Warner for us to really cheer for. And I don't mean as part of the game, I mean to cheer for in life. I'm not going to give you stats and numbers. They speak for themselves, because Warner was so much more than that.
Here's a guy that was told time and time again he wasn't something enough. Finally getting his chance as a senior at Northern Iowa University (who?). Then on to the Arena League, and eventually on to the silly NFL Europe thing. Then after all that, stocking shelves at mid-west grocery store, Hy-Vee (where there's a helpful smile...in every isle.) That's their jingle. Finally getting a call from the St. Louis Rams of the NFL, as their 3rd string QB. That ear he was thrust into the starting role as the injuries mounted. After decades of futility, the Rams won the Superbowl and he the MVP. Then another Superbowl trip another MVP and a Superbowl MVP. A few years later he raised up the Arizona Cardinals franchise (from Phoenix...ironically) and took them to the Superbowl after over 60 years of no success at all. A Superbowl that they should have won. The success in Arizona came after being run out of a city that has virtually no use for underdogs ever - New York City. - Front runners!
OK enough background. Beyond all that, and more importantly, Warner did it the right way. He rose to the top of his profession all the while being told that he wasn't this enough or that enough, or too old or his time was over. Kurt Warner is the quintessential underdog. He even wore number 13 his entire career. And he did it with class, style and made you feel good that there still are guys in this world that kids can look up to that are good for them do to so. It was all never about him it was about the team. (What a concept) He single handedly brought two NFL franchises back from the dead at break neck speed. The Rams have never been the same since he left 7 years ago, the jury is now out on the Cardinals who now have to attempt prosperity without him.
There's an aura of serendipity around Warner that all of us can envy. He is a shining example in life that good things really do happen to good people. And those who have felt that the role of underdog is too much to climb out from under, Warner's story helps put that to rest.
I'm going to miss Kurt Warner from the NFL. But at 38, time caught up with him, and it's time. It's a big loss for the NFL, and all professional sports, that needs all the good guys it can get. Because they seen to be in short supply these days.
Oh by the way, Kurt Warner is going to underdog his way to Canton in a few years to the Hall Of Fame.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
